- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4637 WP No. 65139 of 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 65139 OF 2011 (LR-) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. CHALAVADI HULAGAMMA D/O. MALLAPPA, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 2. SMT. CHALAVADI BASAMMA W/O. LATE CHALAVADI DEVENDRAPPA, AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 3. DARA SHEKAPPA S/O. LATE MALLAPPA, AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 4. HARIJANA SHIVALINGAPPA S/O. MALLAPPA, AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 5. WADDARA YELLAPPA S/O. LATE HIMMAPPA, AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 6. NAYAKARA RUDRAMMA W/O. HUSSEINI, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 7. NAYAKARA NAGARAJU S/O. CHIDANANDAPPA, AGE: 50 YEARS, Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4637 WP No. 65139 of 2011 OCC: AGRICULTURE, 8. GOLLARA LAXMANA S/O. MALLAYYA, AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 9. AGASARA MUNIYAMMA W/O. AGASARA IRANNA, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, ALL RESIDENTS OF RARAVI VILLAGE, TQ: SHIRAGUPPA, DT: BELLARY. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. GIRISH V. BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR P1, P2, P4, P6 & P8 ; P3, P5, P7 & P9 - ABATED) AND: 1. THE LAND TRIBUNAL, SIRUGUPPA TALUK, DIST: BELLARY. 2. SMT. NAGAMMA, AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 3. DODDA SANNA MUDUKAPPA, AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 4. K. LINGAPPA AGE: 45 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 5. K. JAMBANNA AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, 6. K. NAGESH AGE: 40 YEARS, - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4637 WP No. 65139 of 2011 OCC: AGRICULTURE, 7. K. ANAND AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, ALL RESIDENTS OF RARAVI VILLAGE, TQ: SHIRAGUPPA, DIST: BELLARY. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R1; SRI. B. SHARANABASAVA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R7) ------- THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OR OTHER APPROPRIATE ORDER IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT LAND TRIBUNAL, SIRUGUPPA BEARING NO.¸ÀA/PÀA/§Æ¸ÀÄ/ ¸ÀA/PÀA/§Æ¸ÀÄ/ ¸ÀA/PÀA/§Æ¸ÀÄ/ ¸ÀA/PÀA/§Æ¸ÀÄ/37/79-80, RARAVI, DATED 24.03.2011 VIDE ANNEXURE-‘P’ AS ILLEGAL. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M.G.UMA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for time even when the matter is passed over, and called again at 4.15 p.m. The order sheet dated 04.03.2025 reads as under: “Learned counsel for the petitioners prays for time. - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:4637 WP No. 65139 of 2011 Writ petition is of the year 2011. A period of 14 years has already lapsed since filing of the petition. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter. However, to afford one more opportunity, as a last chance, list this matter on 11.03.2025.” Inspite of that, the learned counsel for the petitioners is not ready to address his argument. Hence, the petition is dismissed for default i.e. for non-prosecution. Sd/- (M.G.UMA) JUDGE MKM List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15