IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (112) Kirti & another State of Haryana & others CORAM : Present: SANJAY VASHISTH 1. Constitution of India, is for issuance of direction to the official respondents to provide protection of lives and against the wishes of the private respondents. tabulated as under: Name(s) Age (in years) Date of marriage Rite Representation dated Submitted to Family members arrayed as IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH & another Versus State of Haryana & others CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Mr.Rahul Chauhan, Advocate for the petitioner (s). Mr.Kanwar Sanjeev Kumar, AAG, Haryana. Mr.Sachin Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.4. SANJAY VASHISTH, J. (Oral) Prayer in the instant petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of direction to the official respondents to provide protection of lives and liberty to the petitioners, who have married against the wishes of the private respondents. The details, relevant for decision of the present petition, are tabulated as under:- Petitioner No. 1 Kirti Age (in years) 20 years Date of marriage 21.07.2025 Hindu rites Representation 21.07.2025 (Annexure P-5) Submitted to Respondent No.2-Superintendnet of Police, Hisar, Haryana Family members Respondents No. 4 to 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7928-2025 (O&M) Decided on : 23.07.2025 ……Petitioner(s) Versus ……Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH , Advocate for the petitioner (s). Mr.Kanwar Sanjeev Kumar, AAG, Haryana. Gupta, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Prayer in the instant petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of direction to the official respondents to liberty to the petitioners, who have married against the wishes of the private respondents. The details, relevant for decision of the present petition, are Petitioner No. 2 Parveen 22 years Superintendnet of Police, Hisar, Haryana Decided on : 23.07.2025 ……Petitioner(s) ……Respondent(s) Prayer in the instant petition, filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is for issuance of direction to the official respondents to liberty to the petitioners, who have married The details, relevant for decision of the present petition, are SAILESH RANJAN 2025.07.25 13:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document (112) CRWP-7928-2025 (O&M) -2- 2. It is pleaded in the petition that the petitioners have solemnized marriage against the wishes of their family members, who are threatening and interfering in the matrimonial life of the petitioners. It is the first marriage of both the petitioners. Hence, the petitioners are seeking protection in that regard and have approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition. They have also submitted a representation dated 21.07.2025 (Annexure P-4), to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Hisar, Haryana wherein, they have expressed their apprehension. 3. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. 4. On asking of the Court, learned State counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent – State. Let requisite copies of the complete paper book be supplied to learned State counsel during course of the day. 5. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2- Superintendent of Police, Hisar, Haryana, to look into the representation dated 21.07.2025 (Annexure P-5), qua threat perception, and if there is any substance in it, take necessary steps, in accordance with law, to ensure that the lives and liberty of the petitioners are not jeopardized at the hands of the private respondents. 6. However, this direction will not validate the marriage said to have taken place between the parties and will have no effect on any civil or criminal action, which could be initiated in the matter in accordance with law. 7. Counsel for respondent No.4 submits that petitioners have not approached this Court with clean hands. 8. It will be open to respondent No.4 to raise his objection(s) before the authority who has been directed to decide the representation dated 21.07.2025 (Annexure P-5). July 23, 2025 (SANJAY VASHISTH) Sailesh JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SAILESH RANJAN 2025.07.25 13:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document