Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8270 (CHH)

TIRUPATI STEEL TRADERS v. MARG LIMITED

CRR/242/2020 · 2025-07-22

Shri Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:35586 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 242 of 2020 1 - Tirupati Steel Traders Through Mahamaya Mines Private Limited, Director Anand Agrawal S/o Late B.D. Agrawal, Address - 67/1, Behind Ralas Motors, Tatibandh, Thana Aamanaka, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1 - Marg Limited M.D. Radhakrishna Reddy, Gorepati, Old No. 24, New No. 17, South Made St Shrinagar Colony, Saidapata, Chennai Tamilnadu 600015. 2 - Valeipi Reddy, Rajini Reddy Director Marg Limited 17/24, South Mada St Shrinagar Colony, Saidapata, Chennai, Tamilnadu 600015. 3 - Arun Kumar Gurtu Director Marg Limited A-15/4, Dlf City, Phase - 1, Gurgaon, Hariyana , 122002. 4 - Karanjit Jasuja Singh Director Marg Limited House No. 329, Block KP East, Pitampura, Delhi, 110034. 5 - Rabindra Kumar Samal Secretary Marg Limited Flat No. 10, 3rd Block, Abhilash Apartments No. 75 Laxmi Nagar, 4th Stage , Nanganallur Chennai, Tamilnadu 600061. 6 - B. Bhushan Ex. Director Finance Marg Limited 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chennai 7 - K. Gupta Ex. Director Marg Limited 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chennai. Digitally signed by HEERA LAL SAHU Date: 2025.07.24 18:08:59 +0530 2 8 - MLN Acharyaulu Director Marg Limited 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chennai. 9 - Munvvar Sheriff Ex. Director Marg Limited 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chennai. 10 - Atul Raza Vice President Corporation Company Marg Limited 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chennai. 11 - R. Suresh Chief Finance Officer Marg Limited 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chhenai. 12 - Mr. Sunder Rajan 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chhenai. 13 - Mr. Salava Ganesh 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chhenai. 14 - Mr. C. Suresh 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chhenai. 15 - Mr. Kanha Marg 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chhenai. 16 - Mr. Sudhir Shinoy 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chhenai. 17 - Mr. G.S. Reddy 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chhenai. 18 - Mr. Nagarjun 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chhenai. 19 - Mr. Krishnamoorthy 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chhenai. 20 - Mr. Vijay Kumar 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chhenai. 21 - Mr. S. Shankar Ganesh 4/318 Rajiv Gandhi Salai Kottivakkam Chhenai. 22 - Mr. Deepak Kumar G.V.S. Marg Limited , No. 2, 1st Floor, 80 Ft Road Subbanapalya Extn. Banaswadi Bangalore 560043. 23 - Mr. Benkatesh Marg Limited No. 2, 1st Floor , 80 Ft Road Subbanapalya Extn,. Banaswadi Bangalore 560043. ... Respondents 3 For Applicant : Mr. R.K. Gupta, Adv. For Respondents : Not noticed. Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal Order on Board 23/07/2025 Heard. 1. Mr. Akash Bagmare, Supervisor in the company, is present in person before this Court. His presence be marked. 2. The present revision arises out of the impugned order dated 27.12.2019 passed by Learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Raipur (C.G.), whereby learned Magistrate has dismissed the complaint present by the applicant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for default in payment of process fee. 3. The impugned order dated 27.12.2019 is reproduced herein as under:- "परिवादी की ओ से श्री मुकी श विवानी अधिवाक्ता उप० । अवियुक्ता अनीपस्थित । प्रकीण अवियुक्ता की उपस्थिवित हे त विनीयुत हे$ । परिवादी द्वा आदी विशकी शक्ल अदी नीहे) विकीयु गयु । प्रकीण की अवाल+कीनी विकीयु गयु । प्रकीण की अवाल+कीनी से दीविश,त हे$ विकी प्रकीण मु- विदीनी.की 24.04.2019, 25.07.2019, 05.08.20219, 15.10.2019 एवा. 21.11.2019 की+ आदी श पवि0की मु- वाविण,त सेमुयुवाधि की अ.दी आदी विशकी शल्की अदी कीनी मु- व्युवितक्रमु विकीए जानी की कीण विगफ्त वा.ट जा नीहे) हे7आ । 4 प्रकीण की प8वा, की आदी श पवि0की की अवाल+कीनी से दीविश,त हे$ विकी विदीनी.की 21.07.2016, 16.08.2016, 15.11.2016, 24.01.2017, 20.03.2017, 07.11.2017, 28.05.2019, 10.07.2018, 11.09.2018 एवा. 04.12.2018 की+ सेमु.से एवा. जामुनीत वा.ट की धिलए विवाविहेत सेमुयुवाधि मु- तलवानी अदी नीहे) विकीयु गयु हे$ । धिजासे कीण आदी विशकी जा नीहे) हे+ सेकी हे$ । इसे प्रकी परिवादी द्वा विनी.त आदी विशकी शल्की अदी कीनी मु- व्युवितक्रमु विकीयु जा हे हे$ जा+ उसेकी उप क्षा की+ दीविश,त कीत हे$ से हे प्रकीण की ल.बनीकील मु- वा<वि= कीत हे$ । अत> प8वा, मु- विदीए गए सेमुत अवासे? एवा. परिवादी की उदीसेनीत की+ दृविAगत खत हे7ए प8वा, प श वितधियु? मु- विवाविहेत सेमुयुवाधि की अ.दी आदी विशकी शल्की अदी नी कीनी की कीण दीण्ड प्रविक्रयु से.विहेत की 204(4) की आल+की मु- परिवादी की परिवादी खरिजा विकीयु जात हे$ । प्रकीण की कीयु,वाहे सेमुप्त । प्रकीण की+ व्युवास्थित की अविल ख, विनीयुत सेमुयुवाधि मु- अविल खग प्र विFत विकीयु जावा ।" 4. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the order sheet itself shows that notices have been issued to the accused persons on 12.04.2016, 27.07.2017, 16.02.2018 & 19.02.2019, meaning thereby, the process fee was paid by the applicant several times. 5. On perusal of all the material available in the record, it is found that despite registration of a complaint under section 138 of N.I. Act, the presence of the accused could not be ensured, hence the complaint case has not been decided on the merits. On many occasions the processing fee was paid by the complainant, but on some occasions it was not paid. In such a situation, there is a need to interfere in the order 5 in question so that the complaint case can be decided on the merits of the case. The complaint case is of the year 2016, a delay has appeared. 6. Therefore, the impugned order of the trial court is set aside. It is directed that the complaint case shall be restored to its original status, subject to payment of the cost of Rs. 3,000/- to the District Legal Services Authority, Raipur. The complainant party is directed to be present on 25.08.2025 before the trial Court. The trial court is directed to decide the complaint case as per law, as expeditiously as possible. 7. Accordingly, the revision petition is disposed of with the aforesaid directions. Sd/- (Sanjay Kumar Jaiswal) JUDGE H.L. Sahu