. . HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 25839 of 2025 . , Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State has handed over a copy of the instructions, the same is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 3. By way of the present writ petition, a direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in peaceful marital life of petitioners, has been sought. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted certain queries, which has been made on previous occasion, cannot be satisfied because of non- communication at the end of the petitioners. 5. In view of the above, no useful purpose shall be served by way of keeping the matter only at the behest of non-responding of the petitioners to their respective counsel and as such, the prayer cannot be exceeded as mentioned in the instant petition. 6. In view thereof, present petition stands dismissed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandan Singh, Rajeev Kumar Pandey, Shardendu Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Tannu And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 7. However, it is made clear that the protection granted earlier to the petitioners is hereby discontinued and extension shall be subject to fresh assessment made by concerned police authority. September 8, 2025 #Vik/- WRIC No. 25839 of 2025 2 (Saurabh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad