SANTOSH BANSAL AND ORS v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR.
CRLMP/679/2013 · 2025-09-09
Ashutosh Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8268 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8268 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:36333] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Petition No. 679/2013
1. Santosh Bansal Son of Shri Omprakash Gupta, Age 31 Years, Resident of Sed Road (lSM jksM), Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur.
2. Gulab Chand Son of Shri Arjun, Age 50 Years, Resident of Aastroli (vkLVªksyh), Police Station Sadar Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur
3. Vijendra Son of Sardu, Age 30 Years, Resident of Murti Mohalla, Gangapurcity, Sawai Madhopur ----Accused/Petitioners Versus
1. The State of Rajasthan Through P.P.
2. Irfan Khan Son of Sarfuddin Khan, Age 22 Years, Resident of Near Kailash Takij, Gangapur City, District Sawai Madhopur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl.G.A. Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR
Order 09/09/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the respondent-State submit the factual report dated 01.05.2025, wherein it has been mentioned that after conclusion of the investigation, charge-sheet against one Mishrilal for the offences punishable under Section 420 of IPC has already been submitted before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gangapur City on 10.09.2013, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous. The factual report dated 01.05.2025 is taken on record.
[2025:RJ-JP:36333] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-679/2013]
2. Today, no one puts in appearance on behalf of the petitioners.
3. It seems that the petitioners have lost their interest in the present petition.
4. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Stay application and all other pending applications also stand
disposed of.
(ASHUTOSH KUMAR),J AARZOO ARORA /43