Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82676 (KAR)

SRI. MOHAN v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/24483/2023 · 2025-08-04

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30062 WP No. 24483 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 24483 OF 2023 (SC-ST) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MOHAN S/O LATE RAMASWAMY AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/ATNO 25, A .M. BLOCK, 1ST MAIN, VYALIKAVAL, BENGALURU – 560 003 2. SRI . JALAPPA @ SETU S/O LATE JALAPPA AGE 53 YEARS SRI. K. JAYARAM, SINCE DEAD BY LRS 3. SMT. JYOTHI W/O LATE JAYARAM AGE 40 YEARS 4. J. KACHANA D/O LATE JAYARAM AGE 25 YEARS 5. VARALAKSHMI J., D/O LATE JAYARAM AGE 23 YEARS 6. PRIYANKA J., D/O LATE JAYARAM AGE 20 YEARS 7. KALLAMBAKU PRAVEEN S/O LATE JAYARAM AGE 18 YEARS Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30062 WP No. 24483 of 2023 PETITIONER NO.3 TO 7 ARE LR’S OF JAYARAM ALL ARE RESIDING AT SATHYAMMA COLONY, NEAR POST OFFICE ROAD, VIJAYAPURA TOWN, DEVANAHALLI TALUK – 562 135 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VENUGOPALA G.N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHIVAGONDAPPA S ZULAPI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL BENGALURU – 562 110 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BENGALURU RURAL BENGALURU – 561 203 4. THE TAHSILDAR DEVANAHALLI TALUK OFFICE BENGALURU RURAL – 562 110 5. SRI KRISHNAPPA S/O LATE SUBBARAYAPPA R/AT VIJAYAPURA TOWN , DEVANAHALLI TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 135 6. DR.P. SHIVA S/O LATE JUNJAPPA @ PUTTANNA 7. DR. P. BHASKAR S/O LATE JUNJAPPA @ PUTTANNA 8. DR.P. BASAVARAJU S/O LATE JUNJAPPA @ PUTTANNA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30062 WP No. 24483 of 2023 ALL ARE R/AT SRI SAI DENTAL CLINIC, OPP. BHARAT PETROL BUNK, VIJAYAPURA BUS STAND, VIJAYAPURA TOWN , DEVANAHALLI TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT – 562 135 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ARUNA G.S., HCGP FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. DR. P. BASAVARAJU, R8/PARTY-IN-PERSON; R5 TO R7 SERVED – UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE 3RD RESPONDENT IN PTCL(DH) 12/2010-11 VIDE ORDER DTD 19.09.2016 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AND SAME IN CONFIRMED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN NUMBER LND/SC-ST/ 38/16-17 VIDE ORDER DTD 21.09.2021 AS PER ANNEXURE-B AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 04.08.2025 stating that the petitioners will pursue the remedy before the civil court seeking a declaration. Learned Counsel would therefore submit that writ petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:30062 WP No. 24483 of 2023 2. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. 3. Accordingly writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn while *reserving liberty to the petitioners as prayed for. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL List No.: 1 Sl No.: 63 *Corrected vide Chamber order dated 14/08/2025