Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8266 (PNJ)

SACHET KUMAR v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/17267/2025 · 2026-07-20

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CNR No: PHHC010472972025 CRM-M-17267-2025(O&M) and CRM-M-39453-2025(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 101-4 CRM-M-17267-2025(O&M) Sachet Kumar . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and another . . . Respondent(s) 101-8 CRM-M-39453-2025(O&M) Sachet Kumar . . . Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and another . . . Respondent(s) Decided on :20.07.2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Deepanshu Mehta, Advocate for the petitioner(s) Ms. Ruchi Sekhri, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. (Oral) 1. By way of this common order both the aforementioned petitions are being disposed of. 2. CRM-M-17267-2025 has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.0114 dated 27.02.2025 registered under Sections 420, 406, 408, 120- B of IPC and Section 3 of the Haryana Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishment Act, 2013 and Sections 21, 23 of Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act, 2019 at Police Station Industrial Sector-29, Panipat, Haryana along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom, as the petitioner is totally alien to the matter and not at all connected with the FIR in question but is being RASHMI 2026.07.22 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CNR No: PHHC010472972025 CRM-M-17267-2025(O&M) and CRM-M-39453-2025(O&M) 2 unnecessarily harassed by the local Police. Further prayer has been made for staying the further proceedings. 3. CRM-M-39453-2025 has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS seeking quashing of FIR No. 0066 dated 21.03.2025, under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of BNS, registered at Police Station Julana, Jind, Haryana alongwith all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. 4. Since the investigation is still in progress, present petitions appear to have been instituted prematurely. Accordingly, same are dismissed at this stage. However, dismissal of the present petitions shall not come in the way of the petitioners in seeking bail or any other permissible relief by filing an appropriate application before the competent Court of law. Accordingly, present petitions stand dismissed at this stage. 5. A photocopy of this order be placed on the file of another connected case. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE 20.07.2026 Rashmi Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RASHMI 2026.07.22 11:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document