Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82659 (KAR)

SRI A BABU REDDY v. SRI H P SATHYANARAYANA REDDY

WP/15409/2021 · 2025-09-12

K Manmadha Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36216 WP No. 15409 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO.15409 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. A. BABU REDDY S/O K.M. ABBAIAH REDDY AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.16/2 AMBALIPURA, BELLANDUR GATE BELLANDUR ROAD SARJAPURA MAIN ROAD BENGALURU-560 103. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VENKATARAVANAPAPA M., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: 1. SRI. H.P. SATHYANARAYANA REDDY S/O H.R.POPPA REDDY NOW AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS 2. KUMARI ASHMITHA NOW AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS D/O SRI. H.P.SATHYANARAYANA REDDY 3. KUMARI PRERANA NOW AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS D/O SRI. H.P.SATHYANARAYANA REDDY 4. DR. H.P. SHASHIDHAR S/O H.R. ROPPA REDDY NOW AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36216 WP No. 15409 of 2021 5. MASTER RITHUL S/O DR. H.P. SHASHIDHAR RESPONDENT NO.1 TO 5 ARE NOW AGED AOBUT 10 YEARS RESIDENT OF 28/6, 12TH CROSS 4TH MAIN WILSON GARDEN BENGALURU-560 030. 6. M/S. LSR BULILDERS A PARTNERSHIP FIRM HAVING THEIR OFFICE AT NO.401, JSR ARCADE, HMT LAYOUT VIDDHYARANYAPURA MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 097 REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNERS S. SRINIVASA REDDY AND LIKITA A., …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED AT ANNX-A PASSED BY THE HONBLE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, ANEKAL IN O.S.NO.266/2018. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE K.MANMADHA RAO ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. On the previous date of occasion also, learned counsel for the petitioner was absent. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36216 WP No. 15409 of 2021 2. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (DR.K.MANMADHA RAO) JUDGE ST List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33