Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82648 (ALL)

RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/28435/2025 · 2025-09-25

Sanjay Kumar Pachori

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 28435 of 2025 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. Heard Sri Chandra Shekhar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri Madhvendra Pratap Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. The present application under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. has been filed to quash the entire proceedings of Complaint Case No.804 of 2020, under Sections 147, 323, 506, 379 of IPC, Police Station- Gadwar, District- Ballia, as well as cognizance/ summoning order 12.12.2022, pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division)/F.T.C. IInd, Ballia. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the offence are punishable up to 7 years imprisonment. Upon considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants is, hereby, refused. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicants wants to withdraw the application with liberty to file a regular bail application before the court of competent jurisdiction. In case bail application is filed by the learned counsel for the applicants, the same shall be decided in the light of the observations made in the judgment rendered by the Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation & Another, (2022) 10 SCC 51, wherein the Supreme Court considering the category(A) as mentioned in the paragraph no. 2, bail applications of such accused against which charge-sheet has been submitted on appearance may be decided without the accused being taken in physical custody or by granting interim bail till the bail application is decided. It has been observed that at the cost of repetition, we wish to state that, in category A, one would expect a better Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Shekhar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajesh Kumar Gupta And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) exercise of discretion on the part of the court in favour of the accused. The application stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. September 26, 2025 Mini NA528 No. 28435 of 2025 2 (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Digitally signed by :- MINI KANAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- MINI KANAUJIYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad