Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82628 (ALL)

NAGESHWAR v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS

CRLP/13210/2024 · 2025-05-05

Madan Pal Singh, Siddhartha Varma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:72353-DB Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 13210 of 2024 Petitioner :- Nageshwar Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Brijesh Kumar Mishra,Rajesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Siddhartha Varma,J. Hon'ble Madan Pal Singh,J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that due to efflux of time, the writ petition has been rendered infructuous. He, therefore, prays that the writ petition may be dismissed. 2. Learned AGA has no objection. 3. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as having become infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. Order Date :- 6.5.2025 GS (Madan Pal Singh, J.) (Siddhartha Varma, J.) Digitally signed by :- GAUTAM SONI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad