- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43897 WP No. 24080 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.24080 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. G. SAROJA W/O N.GAJENDRA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, NO. 1108/F, 10TH MAIN, R.P.C.LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560040 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO. 306, 4TH MAIN, 9TH CROSS, BAPUJI LAYOUT, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560040 2. SRI.N.GAJENDRA S/O LATE H. NAGENDRASA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, NO. 1108/F, 10TH MAIN, R.P.C.LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560040 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT NO. 306, 4TH MAIN 9TH CROSS, BAPUJI LAYOUT, CHANDRA LAYOUT, BENGALURU-560040 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. J. R. MOHAN, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43897 WP No. 24080 of 2023 AND: 1. THE REGIONAL MANAGER AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS REGIONAL OFFICE AT NO. 3, 2ND FLOOR, J.V.T. TOWERS, 8TH 'A' MAIN ROAD, S.R. NAGAR, BENGALURU-560027. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER AADHAR HOUSING FINANCE LIMITED, A COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956 KENGERI BRANCH, SITE NO.1107, 2ND FLOOR, 1ST MAIN ROAD, KENGERI SATELLITE TOWN OPP: DOMINOS, KENGERI BENGALURU-560060. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NARAYANA SWAMY D., ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO DEDUCT THE AMOUNTS PAID BY THE PETITIONERS TOWARDS THE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT IN RESPECT OF THE LOAN A/C NO.229000000619 PERTAINING TO THE PETITIONER NO. 1 MAINTAINED WITH THE RESPONDENT NO.2 BANK. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43897 WP No. 24080 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, petitioners have sought for a direction to the respondents to resolve the dispute with regard to the alleged account of the petitioners maintained with the respondent Bank. 3. Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the respondent - Bank is not an authority under Article 12 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the writ petition is not maintainable. 4. It is open for the petitioners to approach the competent authority for resolution of dispute, as provide under the law. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Consequently, I.A.1/2025 stands allowed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16