Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82618 (KAR)

CHANDRAMMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/20395/2025 · 2025-09-01

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34077 WP No. 20395 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.20395 OF 2025 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. CHANDRAMMA W/O. LATE KRISHNACHAR AGED 67 YEARS R/AT. BEKKINA KALAMATA VILLAGE HOSADI POST, NIDIGE HOBLI SHIMOGGA TALUK AND DISTRICT – 577 201 2. KAVITHA W/O. LATE SOMASHEKAR AGED 51 YEARS. 3. VISHWANATHACHAR S/O. LATE HOSALACHAR @ VATHSALACHAR AGED 53 YEARS PETITIONERS 2 AND 3 ARE R/AT. NO.52/2, UPPARAKERI OPP. GARADI HOUSE, GANDHI BAZAR SHIVAMOGGA – 577 202. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. T. A. KARUMBAIAH, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S. BUILDING DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001. BY ITS SECRETARY. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT Digitally signed by DHARMALINGAM Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34077 WP No. 20395 of 2025 SHIVAMOGGA – 577 201 3. THE TAHSILDAR SHIVAMOGGA TALUK SHIVAMOGGA – 577 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH ANNEXURE-M THE ENDORSEMENT DATED 05.02.2025 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT BEARING NO. SMGTAH/ADMORRTI/103/2025 (E/608920) AND DIRECT THE 3RD RESPONDENT TO ENTER THE NAME OF THE PETITIONERS IN PHANI IN RESPECT OF 30x130 FEET LAND IN SY.NO.39 BLOCK NO.17, SITE NO.7, OLD NO.39/1 OF ANUPURA KATTE VILLAGE OF SHIMOGGA TALUK AND DISTRICT WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents. 2. The grievance of the petitioners is that the measurement shown in the RTC in terms of the sale deed dated 24.08.1970 in favour of the father of petitioner No.3 Late Sri Hosallachar @ Vasthalachar should have been 30’ x 130’. But in the RTC it is reflected as 30’ x 30’. When the petitioners approached the Tahasildar with a request to - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34077 WP No. 20395 of 2025 make such correction, the Tahasildar has issued the impugned endorsement at Annexure-M dated 05.02.2025 stating that such correction cannot be made by the said authority and the appropriate remedy would be for the petitioners to seek phodi and dhurast of the lands in question. 3. This Court does not see any infirmity in the impugned endorsement issued by the Tahasildar. The petitioners are at liberty to make an online application seeking phodi and dhurast and if such application is filed, the Tahasildar will place the same before the Assistant Director of Land Records while issuing notice to the neighbours before proceeding to make the correction. 4. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE KLY/-