Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82553 (KAR)

MS. PUSHPA. U. B. v. MR. A. C. PRABHU RAJSHEKAR

WP/6838/2025 · 2025-12-11

Pradeep Singh Yerur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52982 WP No. 6838 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO.6838 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MS.PUSHPA U.B. AGED 57 YEARS D/O.MR.U.H.BASVEGOWDA AND MRS.A.C.ANASUYA R/AT FLAT NO.B 31, NO.11 TALLAM RESIDENCY SERPENTINE ROAD NEXT TO SBI BANK KUMARA PARK BENGALURU-560 020 …PETITIONER (BY SRI BHARGAV G., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. MR.A.C.PRABHU RAJSHEKAR AGED 79 YEARS S/O.LATE MR.A.C.CHANDRE GOWDA R/AT NO.7F, CRESCENT COURT CRESCENT ROAD, HIGH GROUNDS BENGALURU-560 001 2. MR.A.P.PAVAN CHANDRA AGED 55 YEARS S/O.MR.A.C.PRABHU RAJSHEKAR R/AT HULIGERE, KADUR TALUK CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577 138 3. MR.A.P.KIRAN CHANDRA AGED 49 YEARS S/O.MR.A.C.PRABHU RAJSHEKAR R/AT HULIGERE, KADUR TALUK CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 138 4. MS.ARATHI SHARAT KUMAR ALIAS A.P.ARATHI AGED 54 YEARS Digitally signed by GAVRIBIDANUR SUBRAMANYA GUPTA SREENATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52982 WP No. 6838 of 2025 D/O.MR.A.C.PRABHU RAJSHEKAR W/O.SRI SHARAT KUMAR R/AT NO.265, 17TH CROSS SADASHIVANAGAR BENGALURU NORTH BENGALURU-560 080 5. MR.A.C.NIRANJAN AGED 74 YEARS S/O.LATE MR.A.C.CHANDRE GOWDA R/AT HULIGGERE ESTATE HULIGERE POST, KADUR TALUK CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT-577 101 6. A.N.CHANDAN AGED 47 YEARS S/O.MR.A.C.NIRANJAN R/AT HULIGGERE ESTATE HULIGERE POST KADUR TALUK CHIKMAGALURU DISTRICT-577 101 7. A.N.CHARAN AGED 44 YEARS S/O.MR.A.C.NIRANJAN R/AT HULIGGERE ESTATE HULIGERE POST, KADUR TALUK CHIKMAGLURU DISTRICT-577 101 8. MRS.A.C.RATHNAMMA W/O.MR.H.B.LOKESHWAR & D/O.LATE A.C.CHANDRE GOWDA SINCE DEAD, REP. BY HER LEGAL HEIRS MRS.SOUBHAGYA B.L. AGED 70 YEARS D/O.MR.H.B.LOKESHWAR & MRS.A.C.RATHNAMMA R/AT SOWBHAGYA ESTATE HANDLI ESTATE, SOMARPET KODAGU DISTRICT-571 236 9. SHARATH KUMAR B.L. MAJOR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52982 WP No. 6838 of 2025 S/O.MR.H.B.LOKESHWAR & MRS.A.C.RATHNAMMA DECEASED 10. JAYACHANDRA B.L. MAJOR S/O.MR.H.B.LOKESHWAR & MRS.A.C.RATHNAMMA DECEASED MRS.A.C.ANASUYA MAJOR W/O.MR.U.H.BASVEGOWDA AND D/O.LATE MR.A.C.CHANDRE GOWDA SINCE DEAD, REP. BY HER LEGAL HEIRS 11. MRS.U.B.NANDINI AGED 65 YEARS W/O.DR.HARSHA & D/O.MR.U.H.BASVEGOWDA R/AT 253, 15TH MAIN RMV EXTENSION BENGALURU-560 080 12. MRS.U.B.SUMATHI AGED 63 YEARS D/O.MRS.A.C.ANASUYA R/AT 11, TALLAM RESIDENCY KUMAR PARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020 MRS.A.C.SHASHIMUKHI MAJOR W/O.MR.B.K.JAGADISH CHANDRA & D/O.LATE A.C.CHANDRE GOWDA SINCE DEAD, REP. BY HIS LEGAL HEIRS 13. MRS.B.J.MADHUMATHI AGED 55 YEARS W/O.MR.A.S.SHAKARGOWDAA & D/O.MR.B.K.JAGADISH CHANDRA R/AT 379/9, 6TH 'A' CROSS - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52982 WP No. 6838 of 2025 13TH MAIN, RMV EXTENSION SADASHIVNAGAR BENGALURU-560 080 14. MR.B.J.MANU AGED 53 YEARS S/O.MR.B.K.JAGADISH CHANDRA R/AT NO.458, 11TH MAIN RMV EXTENSION, SADASHIVNAGAR BENGALURU-560 080 15. MRS.A.C.POORNIMA AGED 72 YEARS W/O.MR.C.R.RENUKARDHYA & D/O.LATE A.C.CHANDRE GOWDA R/AT 66, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020 16. MRS.C.R.BABITHA AGED 49 YEARS W/O.LATE RAKESH UPPINI & D/O.MR.C.R.RENUKARDHYA R/AT FLAT 7A CRESCENT COURT APARTMENTS CRESCENT ROAD, HIGH GROUNDS BENGALURU-560 001 17. MRS.C.R.ANITHA AGED 45 YEARS W/O.MR.A.C.CHANDRAHASA & D/O.C.R.RENUKARDHYA R/AT 66, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020 18. MS.C.R.KAVITHA AGED 47 YEARS D/O.MR.C.R.RENUKARDHYA R/AT 66, RAILWAY PARALLEL ROAD KUMARAPARK WEST BENGALURU-560 020 19. M/S.HIMALAYA WELLNESS COMPANY A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52982 WP No. 6838 of 2025 THE INDIAN COMPANIES ACT, 1956 HAVING ITS PRINCIPAL PLACE OF BUSINESS AT MAKALI TUMKUR ROAD BENGALURU-562 123 REP. BY ITS GPA HOLDER MS.JAYASHREE ULLAL D/O.DAYANANDA ULLAL … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI JAYAKUAMR S.PATIL, SENIOR COUNSEL FOR SRI PATIL DAYANAND SUBRAYA GOUDA, ADVOCATE FOR R-1 & R-4 TO R-7; SRI B.VACHAN, ADVOCATE FOR R-3; SRI P.NEHRU, ADVOCATE FOR R-19; R-2, R-11, R-13 TO R-15, R-17 & R-18 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE COSNTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AT KADUR IN OS.NO. 163/2025 TO HEAR AND DISPOSE OF IA.NO.1 IN A TIME BOUND MANNER AND CONSEQUENTLY, ALLOW IA.NO.1 IN OS NO.163/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-F FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER XXXIX RULES 1 AND 2 OF CPC PENDING ON THE FILE OF I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AT KADUR. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52982 WP No. 6838 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER Heard Sri Bhargav G., learned counsel for petitioner- plaintiff and Sri Jayakumar S.Patil, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Patil Dayanand Subraya Gouda for respondent Nos.1, 4 to 7, Sri B.Vachan, learned counsel for respondent No.3 and Sri P.Nehru, learned counsel for respondent No.19. 2. Learned counsel for respondent No.3 files a memo along with other documents including the order sheet of the trial Court in O.S.No.163/2025. 3. At request of the petitioner-plaintiff before the trial Court, the permission was accorded to the plaintiff to re-present the plaint before an appropriate jurisdictional Court on or before 05.01.2026. The memo filed by the plaintiff came to be accepted and the plaint was ordered to be returned. Therefore, the original suit in O.S.No.163/2024 would no longer survive on the file of the I Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Kadur. In view of the same, the present petition which is filed for non - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52982 WP No. 6838 of 2025 passing of an interim order would also no longer survive for consideration. No doubt, the trial Court has given opportunity to the petitioner-plaintiff to file a suit on or before 05.01.2026. 4. In view of the above, I pass the following: ORDER i) This writ petition is disposed off; ii) The petitioner-plaintiff is at liberty to file a suit before the appropriate jurisdictional Court at any time and seek necessary reliefs in accordance with law; iii) Upon such suit being filed, the same shall be considered by the trial Court in accordance with law. In view of disposal of the petition, all the pending applications do not survive for consideration and the same pale into insignificance. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE LB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37