Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82541 (KAR)

SRI MALLIKARJUNAIAH v. STATE BY YELAHANKA NEW TOWN POLICE STATION

CRL.P/6526/2020 · 2025-07-18

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26837 CRL.P No. 6526 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 6526 OF 2020 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MALLIKARJUNAIAH S/O KARIBASAIAH AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS 2. SMT NIRMALAMMA W/O MALLIKARJUNAIAH AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS SL.NO 1 & 2 R/A NEAR BUS STAND NARASAPURA POST, KOLAR TALUK & DISTRICT- 563133 3. SMT ROOPA W/O PRAKASH AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS R/AT NO 32, 2ND B CROSS 1ST MAIN, RMV II STAGE, 1ST BLOCK NEAR MEKHRI CIRCLE, ASHWATH NAGAR BENGALURU - 560094 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. MOHAN KUMAR T, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26837 CRL.P No. 6526 of 2020 AND: 1. STATE BY YELAHANKA NEW TOWN POLICE STATION BANGALORE CITY - 560064 REP BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE - 560001 2. SMT S CHANDRAKALA W/O SRI M RAJESH AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/A NO 24, SAMRUDHI NILAYA, AGRAHARA SAMPIGEHALLI ROAD BENGALURU - 560064 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.VENKAT SATYANARAYAN.A, HCGP) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET FILED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT BEFORE AND PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE 44th ACMM AT BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.12608/2018 VIDE ANNEXURE-G FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S.498-A R/W SEC.34 AND SEC.3 AND 4 OF DP ACT 1961 AGAINST THE PETITIONERS WHO ARE ACCUSED 2,3,4 IN C.C.NO.12608/2018 BY ALLOWING THE ABOVE PETITION AND CONSEQUENTLY QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.12608/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE 44TH ACMM (NOW 30TH ACMM) AT BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:26837 CRL.P No. 6526 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the petition on the ground that the matter has been settled between the parties before the family Court. 2. The aforesaid memo is placed on record. 3. In the light of the memo, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn, having become infructuous. 4. In view of disposal of petition, pending application/s, if any, stands disposed off, as no separate order is required. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE ASN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3