Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:8368 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPSS/890/2023 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Ravi Babulkar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Narain Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State.
2. Petitioner is serving as Assistant Teacher (LT) Grade. According to him, the entry regarding place of his posting has been recorded incorrectly. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following relief:
“Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to correct the employee detail/service record of the petitioner so far it relates to the service rendered in accessible area (Sugam) and remote area (Durgam).”
3. Learned State Counsel is right in submitting that the relief, as claimed by petitioner cannot be granted in a writ petition. Whether the school where petitioner served belongs to Durgam or Sugam, can only be decided by departmental authorities. Thus, while granting relief, this Court will have to enter into arena of factual dispute which is not permissible.
4. Having regard to the
facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is
disposed of by permitting petitioner to make
2025:UHC:8368 representation to the competent authority. If he makes representation within ten days from today, competent authority shall look into the matter and take decision, as per law, within five months thereafter.
Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 18.09.2025 Mahinder/
MAHINDER SINGH Digitally signed by MAHINDER SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=da6212e6e78d94ed3134842bc6a8d6ca168979ca7b8c2f031a92d1a18b0892 3c, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=AB77B7C5B240908B392BE84F5CDD4C2AF35DC4626D305B1BC9EA4B ABA43D2B8F, cn=MAHINDER SINGH Date: 2025.09.19 19:10:34 +05'30'