IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 272 CRWP-13312-2025 Date of decision : 22.07.2026 AMARPAL SINGH ...... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...... RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : None for the petitioner. Mr. J.S. Thind, DAG, Punjab. Mr. Angad Chahal, Advocate, Mr. Gurkirat Singh, Advocate, Mr. Karan Inder Singh, Advocate for the respondents No.6 to 11. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH . J.(Oral) 1. A perusal of record shows that on earlier occasion when this case was listed, i.e. on 29.05.2026, the petitioner was unrepresented, and therefore, a direction was issued to the Registry to notify the date, fixed in the present petition, to the learned counsel for the petitioner. As per report of Registry, the date has been duly notify, however despite that the petitioner is unrepresented today. 2. On earlier occasion also, i.e. on 28.01.2026, the petitioner was unrepresented. Thus, it is apparent that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present petition. VIPIN KUMAR 2026.07.22 19:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-13312-2025 2 3. Otherwise also, the learned State counsel has submitted that representation of the petitioner has already been decided and in the enquiry allegations made by the petitioner have been found to be false. As per learned State counsel, in order to protect life and liberty of the petitioner, adequate directions have been issued to the SHO Police Station Mattewal. 4. In view of above, the present petition is hereby dismissed, in default. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 22.07.2026 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No VIPIN KUMAR 2026.07.22 19:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document