GHULAM HYDER v. STATE OF JK AND OTHERS (REVENUE) (LADAKH CASE)
OWP/1531/2015 · 2025-07-02
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8252 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8252 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S.No.57 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR OWP 1531/2015 GHULAM HYDER …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. M.Y. Bhat, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Urba, Advocate Vs.
STATE OF JK AND OTHERS ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. T.M. Shamsi, DSGI with Ms. Rehana Qayoom, Advocate Ms. Rehana, Advocate vice Mr. Z.A. Qureshi, Sr. Advocate
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 02-07-2025
1. The petitioner through the medium of the present writ petition has sought quashment of an order dated 18.08.2015 passed by the respondent No. 2-Financial Commissioner (Revenue) J &K Srinagar in a revision petition filed by the petitioner against an
order of Settlement Commissioner, J&K dated 05.07.2013.
2. Mr. M.Y. Bhat, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submits that issue in question is squarely covered by a
judgment of the Division Bench of this Court passed in LPAOW No. 45/2010 on 31.08.2022 and accordingly prays that the respondent No. 3 be directed to accord fresh consideration to the case of the petitioner in the light of the judgment (supra).
3. Mr. T.M. Shamsi, learned DSGI appeared for the official respondents is not averse to the disposal of the present writ petition at this stage or else to the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
4. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the parties, the present writ petition is taken up for final disposal at this stage. Accordingly, the same is disposed of with a direction to
the respondent No. 3 to accord consideration to the case of the petitioner afresh in light of the judgment of the Division Bench passed in LPAOW No. 45/2010 on 31.08.2022, within six weeks from the date a copy of this order along with writ petition is made available to him and pass a speaking order.
5. Needless to say, the consideration order which is likely to be passed be forwarded to the petitioner through registered post.
6. Writ petition is disposed of along with connected CM(s) in the manner as indicated above. ;
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 02-07-2025 Mubashir