Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82495 (PNJ)

GURTEJ SINGH DHILLON v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRM-M/39288/2025 · 2025-07-24

Sanjay Vashisth

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-39288-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 131 CRM-M-39288-2025 Decided on:24.07.2025 Gurtej Singh Dhillon ......Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others ......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Navkiran Singh, Advocate Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Chanchal K. Singla, Addl. A.G., Punjab. Mr. Akashdeep Singh, Advocate for CBI (appears on advance notice). **** SANJAY VASHISTH , J. 1. Petitioner-Gurtej Singh Dhillon, has filed the present petition under Section 528 of BNSS, for marking time bound enquiry under the Supervision of this Court to the CBI into the killing of a young person namely Jaspreet Singh, aged 22 years in an apparently false encounter as described by the police in FIR No.29 dated 13.03.2025, under Sections 109, 132, 221, 281, 125(b) of BNS and Section 25 of Arms Act, registered at Police Station Sadar Nabha, District Patiala as it is evident from the post mortem report dated 14.03.2025. 2. The allegations against the deceased-Jaspreet Singh was of kidnapping a minor child aged 7-8 years. 3. On advance notice, Mr. Chanchal K. Singla, Addl. A.G., Punjab, appearing on behalf of the respondent/State, submits that the RASHMI 2025.07.25 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-39288-2025 petitioner neither falls under the definition of “victim” as per Section 2(y) of BNSS, 2023, nor has any locus standi to file the instant petition before this Court to achieve his personal goals. He further points out that actual victim in the incident, if any, are parents of the deceased, who have already filed a similar petition bearing No. CRM-M-23707-2025, titled as ‘Baljit Kaur and Another vs. State of Punjab and Others’, which is now fixed for hearing on 17.09.2025. 4. Faced with this situation, counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition. 5. In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE July 24 2025 rashmi Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO RASHMI 2025.07.25 17:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document