S.No.3 Regular List IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 1669/2025 CM(4318/2025) ASHOK KUMAR BHAT(SENIOR CITIZEN) …Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Aman Bhagotra, Advocate Vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Alla Ud Din Ganai, AAG CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL,JUDGE ORDER 21-07-2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for a while, submits that the petitioner would feel satisfied if the present writ petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the respondents to treat this writ petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and decide the same in accordance with law within a reasonable time frame. 2. Mr. Alla Ud Din Ganai, learned AAG, on the asking of the Court, appears on behalf of the official respondents and submits that he is not averse to the disposal of the petition in the manner prayed for. He, however, submits that the representation of the petitioner shall be considered strictly in accordance with the rules and law governing the subject. 3. In view of the above and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal at this stage and is disposed of with a direction to the official respondents to treat the present writ petition as a representation on behalf of the petitioner and accord consideration to the same strictly in accordance with law and applicable rules within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of the writ petition along with its annexures and a copy of this order is made available to the respondents. Needless to say, the order that may be passed upon such consideration shall be communicated to the petitioner through registered post. 4. The writ petition, along with the connected CM(s), stands disposed of in the above terms. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 21-07-2025 Mubashir