IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4480 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11478 of 2018 ====================================================== 1. Md. Rabban Hussain, son Mohammad raja Hussain, Resident of quarter No c/21, Budha Marg opposite Intermidiate council P.O.- G.P.O. P.S. kotwali District- Patna. 2. Asutosh Kumar, son of Ekbal baitha, resident of village- Simri Gopal P.S. Belhua Pusa, District- Samastipur. 3. Sheo Shanker Kumar, son of Late Nagendra Pandit, resident of, Village Daud Nager P.S. Daudnager, District Aurangabad. 4. Niraj Kumar, son of Uday Narayan, Resident of Village- Karman Tola P.S. Nawada District- Bhojpur Ara. 5. Rakesh Priyadarshi, Son of Ramdeo Prasad, Resident of Village- Bikrampur P.S. Fathua District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Deepak Kumar the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. N. Sarvan Kumar Principal Secretary Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Sunil Kumar Singh, Agricultural Production Commissioner, Agriculture department Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. Awadhesh Titmare Director (Agriculture), agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 5. Ravindra Kumar, Chairman Staff Selection Commission Patna. 6. Om Prakash the Secretary Staff Selection commission, Veterinary College Compound, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gajendra Prasad Yadav (SC-17) Mr. Prabhat Kumar, AC to GA-11 For the S.S.C. : Mr. Aslam Ansari, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA ORAL ORDER 4 24-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. This contempt petition has been filed alleging violation of the order dated 17.12.2018 passed in C.W.J.C. No. Patna High Court MJC No.4480 of 2019(4) dt.24-06-2025 2/2 11478 of 2018, wherein, request was made to the Principal Secretary, Education Department to examine as to whether B.Tech (Biotechnology) four years course is equivalent to the B.Sc. Agriculture. 3. Opposite party nos. 2 to 4 has filed a show cause, in which, in paragraph no. 7, it has been stated that upon constitution of the Committee to examine the matte,r it was found that both the courses are not same. 4. In view of the above, I find that the request made by this Court in the aforesaid writ petition has been duly complied with. 5. Accordingly, the contempt petition stands closed and disposed off. Nilmani/- (Nani Tagia, J) U