- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41725 WP No. 6853 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.6853 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. VENKATASWAMY @ VENKATASWAMY REDDY S/O LATE PEDDA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS, R/O 57/2, MADHURANAGAR, 3RD STAGE, CHIKKANEKKUNDI LAYOUT, VARTHUR POST, BENGALURU - 560087. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUDHINDRA S.A., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI. V. CHANDRASHEKAR S/O VENKATASWAMY @ VENKATASWAMY REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O 57/2, MADHURANAGAR, 3RD STAGE, CHIKKANEKKUNDI LAYOUT, VARTHUR POST, BENGALURU - 560087. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE NORTH SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560001. Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41725 WP No. 6853 of 2023 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER BANGALORE SOUTH SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V. NAGAREDDY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS OF ORDER DATED 03.06.2022 PASSED IN THE CASE NO. MSC (SC)/CR/15/21-22 PASSED UNDER SECTION 23 OF THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007 ON THE FILE OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER TRIBUNAL; QUASH THE ORDER DATED 27.02.2023 PASSED IN THE CASE NO. MAG(4)/SC/CR/33/2022-2023 PASSED UNDER SECTION 23 OF THE MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS ACT, 2007 BY THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AUTHORITY (ANNEXURE-D) AND UPHOLD THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 AUTHORITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner filed a memo and submitted that the petitioner be permitted to withdraw the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:41725 WP No. 6853 of 2023 Writ Petition as the parties to the petition have resolved their dispute in O.S.No.606/2021 on the file of Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Anekal, Bengaluru Rural. 2. In that view of the matter, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition as the parties have settled the matter. 3. It is also noted that the petitioner is present before the Court. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20