Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82483 (KAR)

KIRAN KUMAR ATOLIGE v. SHREE POORNANANDA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD

WP/6828/2024 · 2025-07-10

Suraj Govindaraj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27124 WP No. 6828 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 6828 OF 2024 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: KIRAN KUMAR ATOLIGE AGE 42 YEARS S/O SHREEDHAR POOJARY RA/T D.NO. 2-127 SARASWATHI NILAYA ATTOLIGY HOSUE KARIYANGALA VILLAGE KAJE, KOLAMBE POST MANGALORE 574 142 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANIL KUMAR D.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SHREE POORNANANDA CREDIT CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, N.G.O COMPLEX 1ST FLOOR, NEAR MINI VIDHANASOUDHA MANGALORE 575 001 REP BY CHIEF MANAGER/AUTHORISED OFFICER 2. THE DEPT. REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY NO. 62, 2ND FLOOR, MARGOSA ROAD, 3RD MAIN, 18TH CROSS MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE 560 005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI DEVARAJA.A., ADVOCATE, NOTICE NOT ORDERED) Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27124 WP No. 6828 of 2024 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AND ISSUE DIRECTIONS TO R-1 AND 2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DTD. 19.02.2024 RESPECTIVELY UNDER ANNEXURE-C; SET ASIDE THE SALE NOTICE DATED 29.01.2024 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT UNDER ANNEXURES-A AND B AND ISSUE NECESSARY DIRECTIONS TO THE RESPONDENTS, PENDING CONSIDERATION OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 19.02.2024 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ANNEXURE-C NOT TO PROCEED WITH ANY KIND OF RECOVERY ACTION AGAINST THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY INCLUDING DISTURBING PHYSICAL POSSESSION AND AUCTION THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL FOR NON- PROSECUTION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. Despite the order dated 13.06.2025, process-fee has not been paid. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 2. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30