M/S KUNDUR CONTRUCTIONS PVT LTD v. PRATAAP S WADHWA
CMP/440/2024 · 2025-09-03
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82447 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82447 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34496 CMP NO.440 OF 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO.440 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
M/S KUNDUR CONTRUCTIONS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT: FLAT NO.G03 'KUNDUR PARK', JAKKUR AMRUTHAHALLI, MAIN ROAD, JAKKUR, BENGALURU - 560 064.
REPRESENTED BY ITS PROJECT MANAGER JAGADEESH S/O SELVARAJU AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHAMARAJ M., ADVOCATE) AND:
PRATAAP S. WADHWA NO.1016/6/2, JAKKUR, OPP. 5TH MAIN ROAD, G.K.V.K. LAYOUT, BENGALURU - 560 064.
ALSO RESIDING AT:
NO.170, TARAKA, 10TH MAIN, SADASHIVANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 080.
…RESPONDENT (BY SRI. AJESH KUMAR S., ADVOCATE)
THIS CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11(6) OF THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 PRAYING TO APPOINT AN ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL CONSISTING OF SOLE ARBITRATOR FROM THE PANEL OF
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34496 CMP NO.440 OF 2024
ARBITRATORS AT THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION CENTRE, BENGALURU IN CONSONANCE WITH THE CIRCULAR ISSUED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA VIDE CIRCULAR NO.LAW 273 LAC 2012 (P) TO ADJUDICATE AND RESOLVE THE CLAIMS OF THE PETITIONER-SERVICE PROVIDER AGAINST THE RESPONDENT ARISING OUT OF THE WORK ORDER DATED 12TH FEBRUARY, 2021 VIDE ANNEXURE-A AS PER CLAUSE SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES/ARBITRATION.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
This petition is filed under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 based on the clause provided for Settlement of Disputes in Work Order dated 12th February, 2021 (Annexure-A), seeking appointment of Arbitral Tribunal consisting of Sole Arbitrator from the panel of Arbitrators at the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre, Bengaluru. 2. Heard Sri. Chamaraj M., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Ajesh Kumar S., learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 3. Sri. Chamaraj M., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner refers to the clause provided for Settlement of Disputes/Arbitration in the Work Order dated 12th February, 2021 for resolution of dispute by Arbitration and submitted
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34496 CMP NO.440 OF 2024
that, in view of the Notice dated 06th May, 2024 (Annexure-D) has been issued by the petitioner, the Arbitrator has to be appointed by this Court. 4. Per contra, Sri. Ajesh Kumar S., learned counsel appearing for the respondent by referring to the paragraph 3 of the statement of objections filed by the respondent submits that, though the Notice dated 06th May, 2024 (Annexure-D) is issued to the respondent, the name of the Arbitrator is not mentioned in the Notice issued as per Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Accordingly, he sought for dismissal of the petition. 5. In the light of submission made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, I am of the view that, it is appropriate to appoint a sole Arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the petitioner and the respondent. Therefore, Sri. M.G. Sudheendra, District Judge (retired) is appointed as sole Arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the parties at the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre (Domestic and International), Bengaluru. In order to avoid further delay in the matter, parties are directed to appear before the Arbitration
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:34496 CMP NO.440 OF 2024
and Conciliation Centre (Domestic and International), Khanija Bhavan, Bengaluru on 26th September, 2025 at 11.00 a.m.
6. All claims and contentions of the parties are kept open to be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal. 7. A copy of this order be sent forthwith to the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre (Domestic & International), Khanija Bhavan, Bengaluru for proceeding further in the matter. 8.
Registry is directed to return the original documents if any, produced by the parties, after obtaining photostat copy of the same for the file. Accordingly, Civil Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21