- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45280 WP No. 14938 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 14938 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: B.G. JAYARAMA S/O GUDDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, RESIDING AT BELOW MENTIONED ADDRESS #10/4, 4TH CROSS, MUTHTHARAYASWAMY LAYOUT, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, SUNKADAKATTE BANGALORE - 560091. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. KUSUMA M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S.BUILDING, BANGALORE - 560001. 2. THE PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KULUVANAHALLI GRAMA PANCHAYATH, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT – 562111 3. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER, NELAMANGALA TALUK PANCHAYATH, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562123. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHY V., HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER FOR RESPONDENT NO.1; SRI M.S. DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.2 AND 3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING FOR A DIRECTION TO THE Digitally signed by SUMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45280 WP No. 14938 of 2025 RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER WHICH IS MARKED AS ANNEXURE-B DATED 13.11.2024 AND ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR SIMILAR WRIT OR ORDER OR ANY DIRECTION TO THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONER WHICH IS MARKED AS ANNEXURE-C DATED 01.01.2025. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ ORAL ORDER This petition is filed for a writ in the nature of mandamus to the respondent No.2 to consider the representations of the petitioner dated 13.11.2024 and 01.01.2025. 2. The petitioner claims to be the owner of a residential site bearing No.40 property bearing khaneshumari No.24/2/40, E-Khata No.150300700820019 (measuring East to West 12.192 Meters (40 feet) and North to South 9.144 Meters (30 feet) in total 111.48 sq.m. (1200 feet) situate at Kuluvanahalli Grama Panchayat, Dodderi village, Thyamagondlu Hobli, Nelamangala Taluk, Bengaluru Rural District (henceforth referred to as ‘the petition schedule property’). He contends that he filed a representation dated 13.11.2024 with the respondent No.2 for change of eKhata in his name in respect of the petition schedule property. He followed it up with another - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:45280 WP No. 14938 of 2025 representation dated 01.01.2025. He contends that the respondent No.2 has not taken any steps to record his name in the eKhata in respect of the petition schedule property. The petitioner is, therefore, before this Court seeking for the aforesaid reliefs. 3. When this petition is listed for preliminary hearing in ‘B’ group, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3 has filed a memo and has enclosed therewith the eKhata which is now recorded in the name of the petitioner in respect of the petition schedule property. In that view of the matter, this writ petition does not survive for consideration as the reliefs sought for by the petitioner are already granted by the respondent No.2. The Writ Petition stands disposed off on the above terms. Sd/- (R. NATARAJ) JUDGE SMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56