TARSEM SINGH ALIAS SONI AND ANOTHER v. NAVJOT KAUR MINOR THR GUARDIAN BIKKER SINGH AND OTHERS
RSA/51/2025 · 2026-07-20
Vikas Suri
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8243 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8243 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 377 CM-161-C-2025 in/& RSA-51-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 20.07.2026 Tarsem Singh alias Soni and another ...Appellants Versus Navjot Kaur, minor through Guardian Bikker Singh and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI Present:- Mr. Ranjit Singh Sidhu, Advocate, for the appellants. ***** VIKAS SURI, J. (Oral)
1. At the mentioning of learned counsel for the appellants, the case has been called out of turn.
2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellants prays for withdrawal of the main appeal. It is submitted that in execution proceedings, the money decree which has been impugned in the present appeal, stands satisfied and, accordingly, execution application has since been dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied. He has produced a copy of order dated 11.05.2026 passed in EXE-113-2024, titled as ‘Navjot Kaur minor D/o Baldev Singh @ Mandeep Singh son of Bikker Singh vs. Tarsem Singh @ Soni’, wherein the aforesaid fact is reflected. The same is taken on record.
3. In view of the above, the prayer made by learned counsel for the appellants is allowed.
HARISH KUMAR 2026.07.22 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
CM-161-C-2025 in/& (2) RSA-51-2025 (O&M)
4. Dismissed as withdrawn.
5. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
( VIKAS SURI ) July 20, 2026 JUDGE harish Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No HARISH KUMAR 2026.07.22 19:53 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment