Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8243 (HP)

Kishan v. State of HP

CRMPM/454/2025 · 2025-03-11

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Kishan versus State of H.P. CRMP(M) No. 454 of 2025 11.03.2025 Present: Mr. Arjun Lall, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Anoop Rattan, Advocate General with Mr.I.N.Mehta, Sr. Additional Advocate General, Mr. Navlesh Verma, Ms. Sharmila Patial, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General for the respondent/state. Issue notice. Ms.Sharmila Patial, learned Additional Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondent. For the reasons stated in the application coupled with the fact that the appellant/ applicant is in custody, we deem it appropriate to condone the delay of 78 days that has crept up in filing of the main appeal. Application stands disposed of. The appeal be registered. Cr. Appeal No. of 2025 Admit. Call for the records. Cr.MP No. of 2025 Be registered. The application is disposed of with the direction to the applicant to file the translated copies of the documents in question within a period of four weeks. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) March 11, 2025 Judge (yogesh/pankaj)