Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT (247) MANRISHAM SINGH JASWINDER KAUR AND ANR
CORAM:
Present:
ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)
1.
orders dated 17.11.2017 maintenance filed by the respondent allowed and petitioner was subsequently dismissed.
2.
interregnum, the parties have amicably resolved their differences and are now living together peacefully. Accordingly, the petitioner pursue the present petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
3.
petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without expressing any opinion on the merits o
4.
September 24, 2025 manju Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
MANRISHAM SINGH Versus JASWINDER KAUR AND ANR
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN
****
Mr. Sumit Tiwana, Advocate for
Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioner.
ALOK JAIN, J. (Oral)
The present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the orders dated 17.11.2017, whereby the application for ad maintenance filed by the respondent-wife under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was and order dated 08.10.2021 whereby criminal r petitioner was subsequently dismissed.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the interregnum, the parties have amicably resolved their differences and are now living together peacefully. Accordingly, the petitioner pursue the present petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.
Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
September 24, 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether Reportable:- Yes/No
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
CRM-M-50896-2021 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 24.09.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondents ALOK JAIN Mr. Sumit Tiwana, Advocate for Mr. Navjot Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the whereby the application for ad-interim wife under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was whereby criminal revision filed by the
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the interregnum, the parties have amicably resolved their differences and are now living together peacefully. Accordingly, the petitioner does not wish to pursue the present petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without f the case. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of.
(ALOK JAIN)
JUDGE
24.09.2025 ……Petitioner
……Respondents
present petition has been filed seeking quashing of the interim wife under Section 125 Cr.P.C. was evision filed by the
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the interregnum, the parties have amicably resolved their differences and are does not wish to In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn, without
MANJU 2025.09.29 10:53 I agree to specified portions of this document