Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8241 (AP)

G V SIVA SHANKAR KUMAR, GUNTUR DT., v. PAMULA KOTAIAH, GUNTUR DT & ANR, REP PP.,

CRLRC/804/2017 · 2025-09-10

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010087312017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 804/2017 Between: 1. G V SIVA SHANKAR KUMAR, GUNTUR DT.,, S/O.HANUMANTHA RAO, HINDU, AGED 26 YRS, R/ O. DOOR NO. 3-201, GURAZALA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PAMULA KOTAIAH GUNTUR DT ANR REP PP, S/O. VENKATESWARLU RETIRED SUB REGISTRAR, AGED 63 YRS, R/O.PRAKASH NAGAR VILLAGE OF TADEPALLI MANDAL GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BLDGS, HYDERABAD. 3. G A V NAGENDRA KUMAR, S/O.HANUMANTHA RAO, HINDU, AGED 32 YRS, R/O. DOOR NO. 3-201, GURAZALA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, GUNTUR DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of Cr.P.C. praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased toto call for the records relating to orders passed in Crl MP No. 1264/2016 in CC No. 22/2014 Dt. 7.3.2017 on the file of II Addl Jr. Civil Judge, Gurazala, Guntur District and examine the legality, propriety and correctness of the same and consequently set aside the same by allowing the revision in the interest of justice and to pass necessary order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T C KRISHNAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Criminal Revision Case No.804 of 2017 ORDER: This Criminal Revision Case is filed questioning the orders passed in Crl.M.P.No.1264 of 2016 in C.C.No.22 of 2014, which is filed seeking to discharge the accused No.5. 2. The eCourts case status shows the disposal of C.C.No.22 of 2014 on 22.12.2017. 3. Since the main case is disposed of, the present Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 11.09.2025 M K K