- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43630-DB CCC No. 597 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 597 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SUSHEEL KUMAR YADAV S/O BAIJNATH YADAV AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS R/A FLAT NO. A002 NITESH FLUSHING, MEADOWS, SEEGAHALLI VILLAGE MAIN ROAD OPP TO AXIS BANK BENGALURU 560 067. …COMPLAINANT (BY SRI. RAGHUNATH M D, ADVOCATE) AND: DR. SHIVANI W/O SUSHEEL KUMAR YADAV AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/A NO. 122/K, AZAAD MODE NEAR IOCL PETROL PUMP SIDDHIKALA, DISTRICT-SINGRAULI MADYA PRADESH 486 886. …ACCUSED (BY SRI. NAGESH VINAY S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SOMANATHA H., ADVOCATE) - - - THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 10 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971, BY PRAYS THAT TO TAKE SUITABLE ACTION AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR VIOLATING Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: High Court Of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43630-DB CCC No. 597 of 2024 THE ORDERS OF THE HON'BLE TRIAL COURT IN G AND WC.NO.156/2022, DATED 08.08.2022 AND 11.08.2023 ON THE FILE VI ADDL. PRL. JUDGE, FAMILY CURT , AT BENGALURU. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANU SIVARAMAN and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the Trial Court orders dated 08.08.2022 and 11.08.2023 passed in G and W.C.No.156/2022 passed by the VI Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru. 2. The respondent entered appearance and filed a detailed affidavit indicating the compliance of the aforesaid directions of the Family Court as well as the interim order passed by this Court. In support of the assertions made in the affidavit, the accused has placed on record the - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:43630-DB CCC No. 597 of 2024 document which indicates that the order of the Family Court and this Court has been substantially complied. 3. It is pointed out that during the pendency of these proceedings, this Court, by virtue of an interim order, made an interim arrangement with regard to visitation rights of the complainant and the said order has been complied as per the affidavit. 4. We find that there is substantial compliance of the order of this Court as well as the Family Court. 5. Hence, the contempt proceedings are dropped, keeping open all the contentions to be agitated before the Family Court. Notice issued to the accused, if any, stands discharged. Sd/- (ANU SIVARAMAN) JUDGE Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE RV List No.: 3 Sl No.: 42