Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82384 (PAT)

Manish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./83119/2024 · 2025-01-31

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.83119 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-915 Year-2024 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== Manish Kumar, S/O Karamvir Rai, R/O Village- Kalyanpur, P.S- Athmalgola, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sucheta Yadav, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 3 31-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Barh Excise P.S. Case No.915 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of the petitioner, 2 liters of country made liquor was recovered and from a poultry farm, altogether 160 liters of country made liquor was reovered. It is alleged that the petitioner was having the key of that poultry farm. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.83119 of 2024(3) dt.31-01-2025 2/2 case. He has got no cencern with that poultry farm. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is languishing in judicial custody since 27.09.2024. 5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise, Barh, District-Patna in connection with Barh Excise P.S. Case No. 915 of 2024. lata/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T