Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82382 (PNJ)

NEHA MEHROTRA v. NITIN MALIK

COCP/3070/2024 · 2025-01-14

Harkesh Manuja

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

COCP No.3070 of 202 IN TH 278 NEHA MEHRO Vs NITIN MALIK CORAM: HON' Present: None Mr. K for th HARKESH MAN 1. Lear 29.11.2024 passe submit that the p Rs.34,60,000/- ha 2. No o petitioner having parties, is not inte 3. In su same stands dispo case any cause su 4. Rule January 14, 202 Atik Whe Whe 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR COCP No. Date of De HROTRA LIK ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH None for the petitioner. Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the respondent. **** MANUJA, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the respon passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the parties have already entered into has been paid to the petitioner. No one has chosen to appear on beha aving received the money in view o ot interest in pursuing the present peti In such circumstances, no cause sur s disposed of. However, the petitioner use survives in his favour. Rule stands discharged. (HA , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable Yes/N UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH P No.3070 of 2024 (O&M) of Decision: 14.01.2025 ......Petitioner ....Respondent ESH MANUJA respondent relies upon order date ourt in SLP(Crl.) No.12319 of 2024 ed into a settlement and a total sum o n behalf of the petitioner. It appears th ew of settlement arrived at between th nt petition. se survives in the present petition, th tioner may approach this Court again (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 1 r dated 2024 to sum of ears that een the tion, the again in MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.15 14:55 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment