- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31411 WP No. 20818 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 20818 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. GANGALAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE ANDANAPPA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.15, 1ST MAIN ROAD DEPANJALINAGARA OPP. GANESHA JEWELERS MYSORE ROAD BENGALURU-560026. 2. SMT. MAHALAKSHMI W/O CHANNEGOWDRU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT ANCHIPURA VILLAGE MALLABANAVADI, NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT -562123. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. K.P.JAYASIMHA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY HOME SECRETARY VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU-560001. 2. DIRECTOR GENERAL AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE Digitally signed by VANAMALA N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31411 WP No. 20818 of 2025 NO.2, BENGALURU POLICE HEADQUARTERS NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BESIDE RBI BENGALURU-560001. 3. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE INFANTRY ROAD BENGALURU-560001. 4. THE POLICE INSPECTOR BYATARAYANAPURA MYSORE ROAD BENGALURU-560026. 5. RAJANNA R., S/O LATE RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 6. ANANDA R., S/O LATE RAMANNA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS 7. MANOJ KUMAR S/O LATE RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 8. MANJULAMMA W/O LATE. RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS SL.NO.5 TO 8 ARE RESIDING AT NO.16 1ST MAIN ROAD, DEPANJALINAGARA, OPP. GANESHA JEWELERS MYSORE ROAD, BENGALURU-560026. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. K.P.YASHODHA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31411 WP No. 20818 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTION TO THE R3 TO GIVE POLICE PROTECTION AGAINST THE R5 TO 8 IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONERS AS PER ANNEXURE-C AND THEY CONSIDER TO THE APPLICATION/REPRESENTATION DATED 11.06.2025 AS ANNEXURE-C AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD ORAL ORDER The petitioners assert possession of a residential property in Deepanjali Nagar, Mysore Road, Bengaluru [the subject property], and insofar as the cause for the present petition, the petitioners assert that the private respondents are threatening to dispossess them from the subject property with threat to their life. Therefore, the petitioners seek police intervention. It would suffice for this Court to observe that if the petitioners' right to possession is brought under jeopardy especially with the petitioners themselves referring to the suit in OS No.5577/2020, all questions relating thereto must be examined in such suit. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:31411 WP No. 20818 of 2025 With liberty in this regard the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (B M SHYAM PRASAD) JUDGE NV List No.: 4 Sl No.: 14