- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27379 RSA No. 608 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 608 OF 2013 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI MAHESHA, S/O LATE HANUMANTHE GOWDA @ HANUMANTHA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, 2. SMT SUMATHI KANACHANA, D/O LATE SHRI HANUMANTHE GOWDA @ HANUMANTHA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, BOTH RESIDENT OF HOUSE, KHATHA NO.164, A.R.NO.170, ADUVALLI, RAJAGHATTA, HASSAN-573 201. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SACHIN V R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. MANJULA, W/O SIDDE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O ADUVALLI, RAJAGHATTA, HASSAN-573 201. 2. RAJAPPA, S/O NANJEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O SUNDALLI, SALAGAME HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK-573 201. Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27379 RSA No. 608 of 2013 3. SHRI H D KRISHNAPPA, (SINCE DEAD REP. BY HIS LR’S) 3(1) SMT. CHIKKAMMA, W/O H.D. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, (RESPONDENT NO.4 IN THIS APPEAL) (NOTE: THIS SMT. CHIKKAMMA WHO IS ALREADY PARTY IN THIS APPEAL AS R-4) 3(2) SMT. H.K. YASHODHA, D/O LATE SRI. H.D. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, 3(3) KANAKA H.K., D/O LATE SRI. H.D. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, 3(4) H.K. TEJASWI, S/O LATE SRI. H.D. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, 3(5) NALINA H.K. D/O LATE SRI. H.D. KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.3(1) TO 3(5) ARE RESIDIENT OF NO.76, LIG 25/C, 8TH CROSS, 2ND STAGE, KUVEMPU NAGAR, HASSAN-573 201. AMENDMENT CARRIED OUT AS PER ORDER DATED 13.06.2024. 4. SHRI CHIKKAMMA, W/O H.D.KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O BYADARAHALLI, SALUKOPPAL, KATTAYA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK-573 201. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27379 RSA No. 608 of 2013 5. SHRI H P AMAR, S/O H.K. PRABHAKARA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O SARASWATHIPURAM, HASSAN-573 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. K.P. BHUVAN, ADVOCATE FOR R2, SRI. K. MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAVISHANKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R3(1 TO 5), R4 & R5, R1 SERVED) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S 100 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DATED 30.11.2012 PASSED IN R.A.NO.136/2012 (OLD R.A.NO.112/2008) ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE & PRESIDING OFFICER, FAST TRACK COURT 1, HASSAN, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.8.2008 PASSED IN OS.NO.86/2000 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE (JR.DN) AND JMFC., II COURT, HASSAN. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT Appellants and respondents have filed joint memo stating that they have resolved their dispute amicably and in view of the same, the appellants have received Rs.1,50,000/- from the respondents as full and final settlement of their claim and contention. 2. The appellants confirmed the sale deeds executed in favour of respondents. The appellants or anybody have no right, title and interest over the suit schedule property in - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:27379 RSA No. 608 of 2013 respect of properties of respondent Nos.3 to 5 i.e, defendant Nos.4 to 6 and accordingly the appellants and respondents are ready for the disposal of the appeal, in terms of joint memo. Further, respondents submit that they have no right, title or interest over the remaining portion of the property also. 3. The joint memo is taken on record. The said submission is placed on record. Appeal is disposed of in terms of joint memo. Draw decree in terms of Joint memo. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE AKV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5