HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 28939 of 2025 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJ BEER SINGH, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed by learned counsel for the applicants is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned counsel for the opposite party nos.2 & 3 and learned AGA for the State. 3. This application under Section 528 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (hereinafter referred to as BNSS) has been filed for quashing of entire proceedings, including charge-sheet dated 16.06.2023 as well as cognizance / summoning order dated 25.09.2023, of S.T. No. 58 of 2024 (State Vs. Vinayak Pandey and others), arising out of Case Crime No.277 of 2023, under Sections 323, 504, 506, 308, 427 IPC, P.S.- Dhanghata, District- Sant Kabir Nagar, pending in the court of District & Sessions Judge, Sant Kabir Nagar on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicants that the alleged dispute between the parties has taken place due to misconception and that now both the parties have amicably settled the dispute and the informant of the case and the injured do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. In the alleged incident the injured have not sustained any serious injury. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court concerned, has already been verified by the court concerned, copy of which is on record. It was stated that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party nos.2 & 3 has concurred with the arguments of learned counsel for the applicants and submitted that both the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Balram Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Sikandar Khan, G.A. Vinayak Pandey And 3 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) parties have amicably settled the dispute and compromised the matter and the informant and injured do not want to proceed with the case pending before the trial court and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed. 6. Learned A.G.A. has no objection if parties compromise the matter. 7. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 8. It is well settled that in appropriate cases criminal proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise between the parties, by invoking inherent powers enshrined under Section 528 BNSS. In the instant case, the matter relates to private dispute between the parties. If parties compromise the matter, it would not have adverse impact on society. The informant of the case and the injured do not want to pursue the impugned proceedings. The compromise filed by the parties before the trial court, has already been verified by the court concerned. Considering aforesaid facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 9. In view of the aforesaid, entire impugned proceedings, including charge- sheet & cognizance / summoning order, of the aforesaid case against applicants, namely, Vinayak Pandey, Umesh, Ram Prasad & Shivam are hereby quashed. 10. The application u/s 528 BNSS is allowed. September 23, 2025 'SP'/- NA528 No. 28939 of 2025 2 (Raj Beer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP PAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad