RAHUL KUMAR ALIAS RAHUL SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2276/2025 · 2025-03-28
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8235 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8235 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.2276 of 2025
------ Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Saw, S/o Binod Saw, R/o Village-Kumhardih, P.O.- Tantri, P.S.-Jaridih, District-Bokaro
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Atanu Banerjee, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, A.P.P.
------
Order No.03 / Dated : 28.03.2025
Heard both the sides.
The petitioner- Rahul Kumar @ Rahul Saw has been made accused in connection with Jaridih P.S. Case No. 20 of 2023 corresponding to G.R. No.122 of 2023 for the offence registered under Sections 302, 201, 34 of the I.P.C. pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bermo at Tenughat.
Earlier bail application of this petitioner was rejected and the same has now been renewed on the ground that out of ten witnesses, five witnesses have been examined and witnesses have not fully supported the prosecution case and have given contradictory version of the incident. The Petitioner is languishing in custody since 02.02.2023.
Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail.
This Court is of the view that examination of some of the witnesses is not a new ground for renewal of the bail application of the petitioner which has been earlier rejected on merit.
I do not find any change of circumstance for renewal of bail application. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, is hereby, rejected again.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Pawan/-