Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82347 (PAT)

Geeta Devi v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./80765/2024 · 2025-01-24

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80765 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-290 Year-2024 Thana- LAHERIYASARAI District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1. Geeta Devi Wife of Laxman sahni @ Lakshman sahni @ Laksham Sahni Resident of village - Bhigo Jamalpura, P.S- Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga 2. Laxman Sahni @ Lakshman Sahni @ Laksham Sahni Son of Chhitan Sahni Resident of village - Bhigo Jamalpura, P.S- Laheriasarai, District- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr.Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Parties : Mr.Satyendra Narayan Singh, A.P.P. Mr. Padmanabh Kashyap, Deepak Kumar, advs ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 24-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the State and the informant. 2. Petitioners seek regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Petitioners are wife and husband. As per the prosecution case, on the order of petitioner no.2, petitioner no.1 brought knife and handed over it to their son co-accused Ravi Kumar @ Mukhia and on their further order, said Ravi Kumar @ Mukhia stabbed the victim causing injuries on his neck. Injured died during treatment. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.80765 of 2024(2) dt.24-01-2025 2/2 submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioners are merely order giver and they are not the assailant of the deceased. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. Charge sheet has already been filed. Petitioners are in custody since 3.8.2024. 5. Learned counsel for the State as well as the informant oppose the prayer for bail. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts of the case, prayer for regular bail of the petitioners is allowed. Let the petitioner, mentioned above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in Laheriasarai Police Station Case No. 290 of 2024. Shashi (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T