- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39928 MFA No. 8495 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 8495 OF 2018 (CPC) BETWEEN: 1. MRS. TAMANNA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, D/O SHYAM MANGARAM GANGLANI, 2. MRS. SAPNA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, D/O SHYAM MANGARAM GANGLANI, BOTH ARE REPRESENTED HEREIN BY THEIR POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, MR. SHYAM MANGARAM GANGLANI, S/O LATE MANGARAM GANGLANI, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 3. MR SHYAM MANGARAM GANGLANI AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, S/O LATE MANGARAM GANGLANI, ALL ARE R/AT NO.101, 1ST FLOOR, PRESTIGE EXOTICA APARTMENTS, NO.3, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. BHARATH M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. M/S SAPNA DEEPAM DEVELOPERS A PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN HAVING ITS OFFICE AT WINDSOR CASTLE, NO.125, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, Digitally signed by RAMYA D Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39928 MFA No. 8495 of 2018 NO.50/1, PALACE ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 052 REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MR. MADHUSUDHAN REDDY 2. MRS GEETHA GANGLANI AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, W/O SHYAM MANGARAM GANGLANI, 3. MR SHYAIR GANGLANI AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, S/O SHYAM MANGARAM GANGLANI, 4. MRS SHAIREE GANGLANI AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, D/O SHYAM MANGARAM GANGLANI, RESPONDENTS NO.2 TO 4 ARE R/AT NO.101, 1ST FLOOR, PRESTIGE EXOTICA APARTMENTS, NO.3, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. L. CHIDANANDAYYA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 VIDE ORDER DATED 19.12.2018, NOTICE TO R2 TO R4 IS DISPENSED WITH) THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 43 RULE 1(r) OF THE CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 30.03.2015 PASSED ON IA NO.1 IN O.S.NO.7301/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE XXX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU CITY, ALLOWING I.A.NO.1 UNDER ORDER 39 RULE 1 & 2 READ WITH SECTION 151 OF CPC. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39928 MFA No. 8495 of 2018 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the original suit in O.S.No.7301/2014 was disposed of on 01.06.2022 and nothing survives for consideration in this appeal. Placing the submission on record, the appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous. SD/- (HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR) JUDGE KA CT-SG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21