Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82343 (ALL)

TINKU v. RAJAT KUMAR SHARMA

A227/8535/2025 · 2025-08-05

Manish Kumar Nigam

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:132335 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8535 of 2025 Petitioner :- Tinku Respondent :- Rajat Kumar Sharma Counsel for Petitioner :- Mirza Ali Zulfaqar Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "issue an order or direction, directing the learned Judicial Magistrate, Rampur to decide the 7C application in Original Suit No. 233/2024 (Tinku Vs Rajat Kumar Sharma) within a specified period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (7C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Judicial Magistrate, Rampur to consider and decide the interim injunction application (7C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. Order Date :- 6.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad