1 2025:CGHC:9065-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 95 of 2025 Saroj Banjare W/o Ramsagar Banjare, aged about 37 years R/o Village- Dongakuhraud, P.S- Pamgarh, District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Department of Law and Legislative Affairs, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar (C.G.) 2 - Station House Officer Police Station Lalpur, District- Mungeli (C.G.) 3 - Superintendent of Police District- Mungeli (C.G.) 4 - Dr Rohit Sahu S/o Bhondu Sahu aged about 55 years R/o Village- Manoharpur, Tahsil Lalpur, District- Mungeli (C.G.) ... Respondent _________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Ankit Singh, Advocate For Respondent Nos.1 to 4/State : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, GA Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 21 . 02 .202 5 1. Heard Ankit Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, learned Government Advocate, appearing for the State / respondent Nos. 1 to 4. ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Date: 2025.02.21 17:44:27 +0530 2 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs : “i. That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 and 03 to register FIR against the respondent no.4 on the complaint of the petitioner. ii. Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioners. iii. Any other relief, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, may also kindly be granted to the petitioners, in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that despite written complaints being made by the petitioner to respondent Nos. 2 & 3, they have not taken any action on the complaints made by the petitioner. 4. Learned State counsel, on the other hand, has submitted that the grievance of the petitioner can be very well redressed before the competent Court by filing an application under Section 156 (3) or 200 of the Cr.P.C. He further submitted that the controversy involved in the present matter has already been decided by the High Court of Allahabad in Misc. Bench No. 24492 of 2020 : Waseem Haider Vs. State of U.P. Through Principal Secretary, Home Others vide judgment and order dated 14.12.2020 as well as by this Court in WPCR No.333 of 2020 (Akhilesh Agrawal v. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) decided on 12.04.2023, dismissing the said petition, hence, the present petition be also dismissed in terms of the said order. 3 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to avail the appropriate remedy before appropriate Forum. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra