Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82325 (KAR)

SURESHA N L v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/11575/2025 · 2025-08-29

S R Krishna Kumar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33697 CRL.P No. 11575 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF AUGUST 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 11575 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)-) BETWEEN: SURESHA N.L., S/O. L. LINGEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS NIDAGODI VILLAGE, IGGALURU POST, VIRUPAKSHIPURA HOBLI, CHANNAPATTANA TALUK BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAMOD R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY H.S.R. LAYOUT POLICE STATION, BENGALURU, REPRESENTED BY THE STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU - 560001. 2. RAGHUNATH B., AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, ASSISTANT MANAGER, C.M.S. INFOSYSTEMS, PRIVATE LIMITED, SECURITY DIVISION, OFFICE/ AT NO.20, POTREE ROAD, COXTOWN, BENGALURU - 560005. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL RAI, HCGP FOR R1) (NOTICE TO R2 IS DISPENSED ) Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.09.02 18:09:55 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33697 CRL.P No. 11575 of 2025 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.PC BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.8780/2014 ON THE FILE OF IV ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, BENGALURU FOR AN OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTION 408, 120(B) READ WITH SECTION 34 OF IPC AND SET ASIDE THE PROCLAMATION ORDER DATED 30.05.2019 PASSED BY THE IV ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.8780/2014, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER In this petition, petitioner seeks the following relief: "a) Quash entire proceedings in C.C. No.8780/2014 on the file of IV additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, for an offence punishable under Sections 408, 120(B), r/w 34 of IPC; and b) Set aside the proclamation order dated 30.05.2019 passed by the IV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru, in C.C. No.8780/2014, in the interest of justice." 2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned High Court Government Pleader for the respondent No.1 and perused the material on record. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33697 CRL.P No. 11575 of 2025 3. For the order proposed, notice to respondent No.2 is dispensed with. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the proceedings in C.C.No.8780/2014, in which, the petitioner herein is arrayed as accused No.1 presently stands posted before the Trial Court on 08.10.2025, and the petitioner would appear before the Trial Court on that date and file an appropriate application which may be directed to disposed off by the Trial Court in accordance with law. Therefore, it is submitted that proclamation order/attachment/ NBW issued against the petitioner may be set aside and the petitioner may be permitted to appear before the Trial Court on 08.10.2025. 5. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 6. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and undisputedly the Trial Court has posted the matter on 08.10.2025, I deem it just and proper to set aside the Proclamation order/attachment/NBW issued against the petitioner by imposing certain conditions upon him. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:33697 CRL.P No. 11575 of 2025 7. Accordingly, I pass the following: ORDER i) The petition is disposed off. ii) Proclamation order/Attachment/NBW issued by the Trial Court against the petitioner are hereby set aside subject to the condition that the petitioner shall appear before the Trial Court on 08.10.2025, without awaiting further notice from the Trial Court. iii) It is made clear that, in the event petitioner does not appear before the Trial Court on 08.10.2025, the proclamation/attachment/ NBW shall be revived and the Trial Court shall proceed in accordance with law. iv) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to file appropriate application including the application seeking discharge. If such an application is filed by the petitioner, the same shall be considered by the Trial Court in accordance with law. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE KMS, CT-MCK List No.: 19 Sl No.: 5