Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82307 (KAR)

SYED MUMTAZ AHMED v. AJMAL AHMED SHARIFF

CRP/30/2025 · 2025-12-12

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53417 CRP No. 30 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO. 30 OF 2025 (EX) BETWEEN: SYED MUMTAZ AHMED SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS SYED MUJAHID S/O LATE SYED MIMTAZ AHLMED AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT 6TH CROSS, WARDNO.2 VARADARAJAPURA, NEAR MARIYUM MASJID, CHAMARAJANAGAR TOWN - 571 313. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAJESHWARI M, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: AJMAL AHMED SHARIFF S/O LATE NAZIR AHMED SHARIFF, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT DOOR NO. 15/319, COURT ROAD CHAMARAJANAGAR CITY - 571 313. …RESPONDENT THIS CRP FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC, AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 08.01.2025 PASSED IN EX.NO.44/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:53417 CRP No. 30 of 2025 CHAMARAJANAGARA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE EXECUTION PETITION. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER None appears for the revision petitioner. Revision petition came to be filed on 10.01.2025. Till today, office objections are not complied. The order passed by the Executing Court in Execution Case No.44/2023, where the Police protection was ordered for the decree-holder to execute the decree. Such an order is per se not revisable. Therefore, the revision petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE KAV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 6