PRINKLE GUPTA v. GURPREET SINGH BHULLAR AND ANOTHER
COCP/3600/2025 · 2025-07-25
Nidhi Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82293 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 82293 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 105
Prinkle Gupta
Gurpreet Singh Bhullar, Commissioner of Police, Amritsar and another
CORAM:
Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
proceedings the order dated Bench of this Court in CRWP State of Punjab and others”, vide which direction was issued to respondent No.1 herein to 13.5.2025 and 19.5.2025 (Annexures P within a period of four weeks from 06.6.2025.”
necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 22.7.2025 by the respondent in the present petition.
COCP-3600-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP No.3600 of 2025
Date of decision : Prinkle Gupta Versus Gurpreet Singh Bhullar, Commissioner of Police, Amritsar and
CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Vivek Singla, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Kanav Singla, AAG, Punjab.
NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proceedings be initiated against the respondent the order dated 06.6.2025 (Annexure P- Bench of this Court in CRWP-6048-2025 of Punjab and others”, vide which direction was issued to respondent No.1 herein to “…decide the representation(s) dated 13.5.2025 and 19.5.2025 (Annexures P-1 and P within a period of four weeks from 06.6.2025.”
Learned counsel for the respondent necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order dated 22.7.2025 by the respondent-authority; thus, no cause survives in the present petition.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3600 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-25.07.2025 …..Petitioner Gurpreet Singh Bhullar, Commissioner of Police, Amritsar and …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Vivek Singla, Advocate Mr. Kanav Singla, AAG, Punjab. counsel for the petitioner submits that contempt against the respondent(s) for not complying -1) passed by a co-ordinate 2025 titled as “Prinkle Gupta vs. of Punjab and others”, vide which direction was issued to
“…decide the representation(s) dated 1 and P-2) of the petitioner within a period of four weeks from 06.6.2025.” he respondent-State submits that necessary compliance has been made, while passing a speaking order authority; thus, no cause survives VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.25 21.21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
the learned counsel for the respondent thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper
passed in the present petition, the same is
July 25, 202 Vijay Asija
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
COCP-3600-2025 (O & M) Copy of the aforesaid order dated 22.7.2025 produced by
learned counsel for the respondent-State is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper In view of the above, no further orders are required to passed in the present petition, the same is Rule stands discharged.
Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. , 2025
Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No
2 Copy of the aforesaid order dated 22.7.2025 produced by State is taken on record. Copy thereof is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Registry to tag/paginate the same at appropriate place in the paper-book. In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present petition, the same is disposed of accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.07.25 21.21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document