Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 82290 (PNJ)

SATISH NAGAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER

CRM-M/40526/2025 · 2025-07-30

Sandeep Moudgil

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

145 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-40526-2025 DECIDED ON:30.07.2025 SATISH NAGAR AND ANOTHER .....PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Kamal Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioners. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This is a petition under Section 528 of BNSS, 2023 with a prayer to quash impugned order dated 29.09.2023 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Ld. Sessions Judge, Faridabad, to the extent that the petitioner has been directed to deposit 20% of the cheque amount as awarded by the Ld. Trial Court/JMIC, Faridabad vide order dated 31.08.2023 passed in complaint filed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, without considering the facts and pleadings of the case and without evaluating the merits or recording any reasons for the same. The learned counsel for the petitioners argues that the lower Appellate Court erred in failing to properly consider the facts and wrongly imposed a condition requiring the deposit of 20% of the compensation. This condition, according to the counsel, is illegal, arbitrary, and violates the legal principles established by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal Nos. 2741 of 2023 (arising out of SLP(Crl.) Nos. 4927 of 2023,titled as Jamboo Bhandari vs. M.P. MEENU 2025.07.30 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-40526-2025 -2- State Industrial Development Corporation Ltd. and others), decided on 04.09.2023 wherin it has been observed as under : "6. What is held by this Court is that a purposive interpretation should be made of the 148 of the act. Hence, normally, Appellate Court will be justified in imposing the condition of deposit as provided in Section 148. However, in a case where the Appellate Court is satisfied that the condition of deposit of 20% will be unjust or imposing such a condition will amount to deprivation of the right of appeal of the appellant, exception can be made for the reasons specifically recorded 7. Therefore, when Appellate Court considers the prayer under section 389 of the Cr.P.C. of an accused who has been convicted for offence under section 138 of the N.I. Act, it is always open for the Appellate Court to consider whether it is an exceptional case which warrants grant of suspension of sentence without imposing the condition of deposit of 20% of the fine/compensation amount. As stated earlier, if the Appellate Court comes to the conclusion that it is an exceptional case, the reasons for coming to the said 4 conclusion must be recorded." After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the petitioners and reviewing the judgment in Jamboo Bhandari (supra), it is evident that the lower Appellate Court was obligated to assess whether the current case falls under the exception. The the impugned order dated 29.09.2023 (Annexure P-4) passed by the Ld. Sessions Judge, Faridabad vide which imposed the condition of depositing 20% of the awarded compensation amount, is therefore set aside. The lower Appellate Court is directed to reconsider the case, allowing the petitioners the opportunity to present arguments on the application, if moved by the petitioner under Section 148 of NI Act, and to determine if the case warrants a waiver of the 20% deposit requirement as mandated by the trial Court. The petitioners are directed to file an application before the Lower Appellate Court alongwith reasons making him entitle to waiver of 20% of the awarded compensation amount, as directed vide order dated 29.09.2023 (Annexure P-4). The petitioners are further directed to surrender before the trial Court within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this MEENU 2025.07.30 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-40526-2025 -3- order and move an application seeking regular bail, which shall be decided in accordance with law on the same day. The petition is disposed of accordingly (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 30.07.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No MEENU 2025.07.30 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document