TA No. TA No. TA No. TA No.1263 1263 1263 1263 of of of of 202 202 202 202 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 302 RACHNA RACHNA RACHNA RACHNA Vs Vs Vs Vs PINKAL PINKAL PINKAL PINKAL CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Kushger Goyal Ms. Dimple Jain, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. for the respondent HARKESH MANUJA, HARKESH MANUJA, HARKESH MANUJA, HARKESH MANUJA, 1.1.1.1. The case bearing “DMC/238/2025 DMC/238/2025 DMC/238/2025 DMC/238/2025 the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Court of learned Principal Judge, Judge, Family Court, District 2.2.2.2. Briefly stating, the marriage between the was solemnized on matrimonial discord came to be preferred at the instance of respondent application seeking transfer 3. Learned counsel for the applicant-wife is residing 202 202 202 2025555 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH Transfer Application No. ransfer Application No. ransfer Application No. ransfer Application No. Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: ...... ...... ...... ...... …..Respondent(s) …..Respondent(s) …..Respondent(s) …..Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Kushger Goyal, Advocate and Ms. Dimple Jain, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Ajay Kumar Vijarania, Advocate for the respondent (through V.C.). **** HARKESH MANUJA, HARKESH MANUJA, HARKESH MANUJA, HARKESH MANUJA, J. (Oral) J. (Oral) J. (Oral) J. (Oral) The applicant-wife, by way of present DMC/238/2025 DMC/238/2025 DMC/238/2025 DMC/238/2025 titled “Pinkal vs. Rachna Pinkal vs. Rachna Pinkal vs. Rachna Pinkal vs. Rachna Marriage Act, 1955, at the instance of respondent learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Judge, Family Court, District Sirsa. Briefly stating, the marriage between the was solemnized on 22.04.2021 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. matrimonial discord between the parties, the above mentioned divorce petition preferred at the instance of respondent application seeking transfer thereof came to be filed by the Learned counsel for the applicant wife is residing alone in a rented accommodation at Sir IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH AT CHANDIGARH ransfer Application No. ransfer Application No. ransfer Application No. ransfer Application No.1263 1263 1263 1263 of of of of 202 202 202 2025555 (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) (O&M) Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: Date of Decision: 20 20 20 20.07.2026 .07.2026 .07.2026 .07.2026 ...... ...... ...... ......Applicant Applicant Applicant Applicant …..Respondent(s) …..Respondent(s) …..Respondent(s) …..Respondent(s) HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA , Advocate wife, by way of present application, seeks transfer of Pinkal vs. Rachna Pinkal vs. Rachna Pinkal vs. Rachna Pinkal vs. Rachna””””, filed under Section 9 instance of respondent-husband; from the Family Court, Bhiwani to the learned Princip Briefly stating, the marriage between the applicant and respondent 22.04.2021 as per Hindu rites and ceremonies. On account between the parties, the above mentioned divorce petition preferred at the instance of respondent-husband. Thereupon, the present came to be filed by the applicant-wife. applicant, inter alia, contends that the alone in a rented accommodation at Sirsa.... Accordingly, a 1 transfer of 9 of husband; from the Principal respondent n account of between the parties, the above mentioned divorce petition , the present , contends that the Accordingly, a MOHMED ATIK 2026.07.22 09:23 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment