- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52610 WP No. 30415 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 30415 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SAVITHA N, W/O SATISH S.M. AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC: SOCIAL SCIENCE TEACHER, KITTUR RANI CHANNAMMA RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL (SC-424), HEBAIRU, SALLI VILLAGE, K.R.NAGARA TQ. MYSURU - 571604. 2. SRI. RAVI.P, S/O B.PUTTASWAMY GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC: KANNADA TEACHER, MORARJI DESAI RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL (BC-178), HOSAHOLALU, K.R. PET, MANDYA - 571426. 3. SRI.MANJUNATH.K.N, S/O SRI.NANJAPPA.K, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS OCC: PRINCIPAL QUALIFICATION, M.A., M.ED., KITTURU RANI CHANNAMMA, Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52610 WP No. 30415 of 2025 RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL (425) HEER NANJANGUD TQ, MYSURU - 577101. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI.JAVEED S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY, SOCIAL WELFARE DEPT, STATE OF KARNATAKA, VIKAS SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560001. 2. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, KARNATAKA RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL, INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY, AN ORGANIZATION OF SOCIAL WELFARE DEPARTMENT, CUNNINGHAM ROAD, BANGALORE - 560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.B.P.RADHA., AGA FOR R1 SRI.SIDDHARTH BABU RAO., ADVOCATE FOR R2) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA SEEKING MANDAMUS DIRECTING RESPONDENT NO.2 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONERS DATED:12.09.2025, 09.04.2025 AND 13.05.2025 RESPECTIVELY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING - B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52610 WP No. 30415 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The petitioners filed this petition seeking a Mandamus directing respondent No.2 to consider the representations of the petitioners vide dated:12.09.2025, 09.04.2025 and 13.05.2025 respectively vide Annexures- J, J1 and J2. The petitioners filed the representations requesting respondent No.2 to give a weightage. Respondent No.2 has not passed any order on the representations submitted by the petitioners, hence, this Writ Petition. 2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 3. The learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that if the reasonable time is granted, respondent No.2 would consider the representations vide Annexures-J, J1 and J2 respectively, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:52610 WP No. 30415 of 2025 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for respondent No.2. Accordingly, I proceed to pass following order. 5. The Writ Petition is disposed of directing Respondent No.2 to consider the representations vide Annexures-J, J1 and J2 respectively, and pass appropriate order in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 39