IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 127 Anil Kumar and others Sonaley CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. for setting aside the impugned order dated passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana 4535-2018 whereby the application under Section 73 o Evidence Act (Annexure P comparison of disputed signatures of the respondent was allowed. 2. to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to the petitioner to law, if any. 3. 4. 5. 17.09.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-4730 Date of Decision: 1 Anil Kumar and others Versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Inderjeet Singh Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner for setting aside the impugned order dated passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana 2018 whereby the application under Section 73 o Evidence Act (Annexure P-2) filed by the respondent/defendant for comparison of disputed signatures of the respondent was allowed. After arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, if any. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn with the libert Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 4730-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.09.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Inderjeet Singh Chawla, Advocate for the petitioner. The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner for setting aside the impugned order dated 23.05.2025 (Annexure P-4) passed by the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ludhiana in CS No. 2018 whereby the application under Section 73 of the Indian 2) filed by the respondent/defendant for comparison of disputed signatures of the respondent was allowed. fter arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined to interfere in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to the take recourse to the appropriate remedy, in accordance with with the liberty aforesaid. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No The present revision petition has been filed by the petitioner 4) in CS No. f the Indian 2) filed by the respondent/defendant for fter arguing for some time, when this Court is not inclined the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to the take recourse to the appropriate remedy, in accordance with RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.18 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.