SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS BA1/1120/2025 Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J. (Through V.C.) 1. Mr. Shariq Khurshid, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. V. S. Pal, learned AGA for the State. 3. Present applicant “Aadil, son of Mohd. Shakeel” is praying for regular bail in relation to First Information Report dated 19.04.2025 bearing FIR No. 0158 of 2025, Police Station – Kashipur, District – Udham Singh Nagar wherein present applicant along two others namely Salman and Khalid have been implicated for the offences punishable under Section 143 (3) of BNS, 2023 and under Section 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 of the Immoral Trafficking (Prevention) Act, 1956. 4. It is contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and charge sheet has been filed without collecting material evidence. 5. He further submits that applicant is seeking bail on the ground of parity as other co-accused Salman and Khalid have already been enlarged on bail by this Court and other co-accused Rajesh @ Raju, whose name was disclosed by the victim during investigation was granted interim bail by the Coordinate Bench in ABA No. 840 of 2025. He further submits that since the charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant. 6. On the other side, Mr. V. S. Pal, learned AGA, have not disputed this fact that this is a case of parity since co-accused Salman and Khalid have already been enlarged on bail by this Court and other co accused Rajesh @ Raju, has already been granted interim bail by the Coordinate Bench in ABA No. 840 of 2025. He further submits that since the charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant. 7. After hearing the arguments of learned counsel for the parties and further taking into consideration the fact that since the charge sheet has already been filed, therefore, there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant and co-accused Salman and Khalid have already been enlarged on bail by this Court and other co-accused Rajesh @ Raju was granted interim bail by the Coordinate Bench in ABA No. 840 of 2025, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant “Aadil, son of Mohd. Shakeel” be released on bail on furnishing his personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. (Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 03.09.2025 SKS