AJAY SHARMA S/O SHRI RAMDEV SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/3447/2025 · 2025-03-12
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8224 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8224 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:11394] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3447/2025 Ajay Sharma S/o Shri Ramdev Sharma, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of 126A, Jain Vihar Colony, Kamla Nehru Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur - 302021 (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical Education Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur
2. National Medical Commission, Through Its Secretary, Pocket- 14, Sector - 8, Dwarka Phase -1. New Delhi - 110077
3. The Chairman, Fees Regulatory Authority, Medical Colleges, Government Of Rajasthan, Jaipur
4. Registrar, Nims University, Nh-11C, Delhi-Jaipur Expressway, Shobha Nagar, Jaipur.
5. Convener, Ug Admission Board, Nims University, Nh-11C, Delhi-Jaipur Expressway, Shobha Nagar Jaipur.
6. Principal, National Institute Of Medical Sciences, Medical Colleges And Hospital, Nims University, Nh-11C, Delhi- Jaipur Expressway, Shobha Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ghulam Noorani For Respondent(s) : Mr. Yash Joshi for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 12/03/2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed notice for demand of justice alleging his grievance that exorbitantly high fee was charged by the respondents. Secondly, it is submitted that stipend due qua the petitioner is not paid, till date.
[2025:RJ-JP:11394] (2 of 2) [CW-3447/2025] For the respondent-State Mr. Yash Joshi has submitted that the dispute is inter-se the University (Respondent-6) and the student (petitioner). Considering the fact of the case we deems it apposite to
disposed of the matter with the direction that notice of demand of justice dated 25.08.2023, which was served by the registered post by the petitioner, be answered within an upper limit of 30 days from the date of passing of this order, by way of a speaking order. The copy of the same be furnished to respondent No.1 and
2. It is made clear that if the aforementioned directions are not complied within the stipulated time, the respondent no.1 and 2 may seek appropriate explanation and take action against the respondent NIMS University. Accordingly, the instant petition is disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA Preeti Asopa/517