APHC010087532007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 24083/2007 Between: 1. G.V.NAGESWARA RAO, ELURU, W.G.DISTRICT, S/O.G.POLAIAH EX.CONDCUTOR APSRTC, ELURU DEPOT, R/O.NEAR PANCHAYAT OFFICE SATRAMPADU, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE M D APSRTC MUSHEERABAD HYDERABAD ANOTHER, HYDERABAD 2. THE DEPOT MANAGER APSRTC ELURU DEPOT, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records relating to award passed in ID.No.156 of 2004 dated 1.5.2007 on the file of Labour court, Guntur and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service with all backwages and attendant benefits and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case IA NO: 1 OF 2007(WPMP 31384 OF 2007 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P GOVIND REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C PRAKASH REDDY(SC FOR APSRTC) The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri P.Govind Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through virtual mode and brought to the notice of this Court that he has given up vakalat on 22.09.2023 itself. Till today, petitioner did not choose to engage another counsel. It shows that the petitioner is not having any interest in prosecuting the matter. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (2) months. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 15th September, 2025 RKS