- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28867 WP No. 15790 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO. 15790 OF 2025 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. ANJINAMMA W/O LATE HANUMANTHARAYAPPA D/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/AT KOLATHUR VILLAGE HOSKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 114. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BABU, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT M.S.BUILDING BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYATHI HOSKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 114. 3. PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER JADAGENAHALLI GRAM PANCHAYATH Digitally signed by H K HEMA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28867 WP No. 15790 of 2025 JADAGENAHALLI HOBLI HOSKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 4. THE SECRETARY JADAGENAHALLI GRAM PANCHAYATH JADAGENAHALLI HOBLI HOSKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. 5. ASHOK M. S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT KOLATHUR VILLAGE HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 114. 6. G. RAMESH S/O GUDIYAPPA AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS R/AT: 131, KOLATHUR VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, HOSAKOTE TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 114. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SPOORTHI V., HCGP FOR R1; SRI. M.S.DEVARAJU, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R4; VIDE ORDER DATED 05.06.2025 NOTICE TO R6 IS DEFERRED FOR TIME BEING) THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS AGAINST THE RESPONDENTS NOS.2 TO 4 TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION AND MEMORANDUM OF APPEAL AND I.A VIDE ANNEXURES-A TO C AND TO DISPOSE OF THE SAME IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28867 WP No. 15790 of 2025 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN ORAL ORDER At the request of respondent No.6, khatha in respect of the property which is the subject matter of the writ petition was changed into his name by respondent No.3. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with a prayer to direct respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to change the khatha of the property concerned in favour of respondent No.6. 2. As the khatha has already been changed in the name of respondent No.6, the writ petition is hereby dismissed as having become infructuous reserving liberty to the petitioner to challenge the same in the manner known to law. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE PGG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10